RedStickHusky
formerly SeoulHuskyFan
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,549
- Reaction Score
- 17,912
Kind of nice to wear down an FCS opponent.
Yes it is and yes it does... Hopefully good learning for ZT. That fade to Flynn looked pretty nice. FWIW, a step up from our recent history with FCS games.This is what you’re supposed to do against an FCS team. Passing game still needs a lot of work though.
Agreed. I thought Zion was fine today, much better than last week. I think we’re just lacking playmaking receivers given the injury issues.Yes it is and yes it does... Hopefully good learning for ZT. That fade to Flynn looked pretty nice. FWIW, a step up from our recent history with FCS games.
It's a respectable start in the "Comeback of The Rent..."attendance 22,442!!
I was surprised when I saw those stats. It didn't feel as dominating while watching as you would think from reading those stats.
It just didn't feel like UConn almost doubled up their yards.28-3 and really wasn’t even close. They only sniffed the end zone once. We didn’t even play outstanding.
Funny thing was unlike recent FCS games, I never felt this one was in doubt. We just had better players. There are lots of games like this every year where the better team doesn’t do much but also doesn’t let the weaker one make crucial plays. Eventually the tide turns.Down 7-3, 1st down and goal and coming away with nothing really hurt CCSU chances. They were close just before and suffered a bad snap and came away with nothing. CCSU made some nice hits. Worn down.
Intresting you felt that way. UConn had two red zone turnovers A blocked FG and ccsu only had one really good drive - that first one of second half.I was surprised when I saw those stats. It didn't feel as dominating while watching as you would think from reading those stats.
I guess with UConn leading 7-3 five minutes into the third quarter and CCSU at the goal line, it didn't feel like UConn was dominating the stats. I do think from that point on, they were dominant...but until then the game was a toss up.Intresting you felt that way. UConn had two red zone turnovers A blocked FG and ccsu only had one really good drive - that first one of second half.
It wasn’t a super dominant game, but they clearly overmatched central.
Yeah, wouldn't say, wow! yet. Nice throw on the missed opportunity to Harrison at corner of the endzone though.Funny thing was unlike recent FCS games, I never felt this one was in doubt. We just had better players. There are lots of games like this every year where the better team doesn’t do much but also doesn’t let the weaker one make crucial plays. Eventually the tide turns.
I will say this, though. I’m not seeing it with the quarterback. He doesn’t look to me like he is going to be much more than an average player. Now we would have given a million bucks for an average quarterback the last few years, but for all the hype, he has a long long way to go.
That is the difference. That and you didn’t have Nate Carter. Your #1s can probably play for UConn at many positions. Some maybe as good. But once you go to the backup right guard the drop off is substantial. It is why you see many FCS teams hang with FBS teams for a half. By the third quarter, though the deeper, and more talented FBS eventually pulls away.I disagree about talent. Central had players just as fast, strong, or talented as UConn.
Fact is we had no depth and it showed. Definitely got winded, cramps and couldn't rotate enough guys in without it having a huge negative impact. It all starts that we have about 60 scholarships to UConn's 85. Obviously, FCS vs FBS recruiting labels, and $3M vs $17M. There was very little chance we we going to win.
Mora has definitely changed the program; if this was last season, I think it would have been a lot closer and the odds of a CCSU victory would have been much higher
That was my view of things. They don’t shoot themselves in the foot and it could have been over by half. It wasn’t but Central didn’t do much offensively except the drive in the 2nd half that got blown up. And I never had the feeling that they could do that again. Could UConn have panicked and lost? Sure. Did it feel like they would? Not to me.Intresting you felt that way. UConn had two red zone turnovers A blocked FG and ccsu only had one really good drive - that first one of second half.
It wasn’t a super dominant game, but they clearly overmatched central.
UConn started a freshman QB in his first career start. He is going to have growing pains. Plus, he is missing UConn’s top 2 WRs. Considering all that, he is doing fine and he will get better every week. If UConn didn’t struggle in the red zone, the game could have been 38-3. UConn used their physical and depth superiority to win despite having an inexperienced QB and an injury riddled WR group. That is what an FBS team is supposed to do to an FCS school.