everyone a 10
yanna
btw, what's the prize?
Which poster?with the poster's here knowledge
Probably a dozen or so, but I won't explain why until the voting is done. Don't want to influence the voting more than I might have already.Which poster?
It shouldn't be taken that seriously.Probably a dozen or so, but I won't explain why until the voting is done. Don't want to influence the voting more than I might have already.
Some of us. . . Just don’t care.I am impressed with the poster's here knowledge of probability and statistics. Let's just say that the strategy to win the contest, and the strategy to maximize the expected value of your points are two different things, and i can tell that many understand the difference!



who is Katelyn?Paige-10
Ash-10
Chen-5
Ice-5
Jana-5
Sarah-5
KK-5
Katelyn-5
Paige 10
Strong 9
Chen 9
Jana 9
Shade 8
kk 8
Ice 5
"Katelyn" is Kaitlyn Chen.who is Katelyn?
Folks, as vote tabulator it's much easier for me if you use last names other than obvious ones (Paige and KK and Ice)
He already includes a line for "Chen.""Katelyn" is Kaitlyn Chen.
Ah.He already includes a line for "Chen."
Oops-He already includes a line for "Chen."
But at least both received a "5". Got to like the consistency. It would have been weird otherwise.He already includes a line for "Chen."
You are probably giving some posters, way too much credit.I am impressed with the poster's here knowledge of probability and statistics. Let's just say that the strategy to win the contest, and the strategy to maximize the expected value of your points are two different things, and i can tell that many understand the difference!

I don’t agree. A practical starting five with three guards and two forwards fairly leaps out of the data. The highest confidence players are Paige Jana and Ash, and after them, people are divided between KK and Kaitlyn (presumably at PG), on the one hand, and Ice and Sarah (presumably at forward) on the other. This is the clear outline of a 5+2 lineup. Admittedly, confidence ratings for starters are not direct expressions of who the chief subs will be (the +2 in the 5+2), but the correlation seems likely. This is what the BY hive mind appears to think.I don’t believe that choosing the actual Starting 5 is necessarily the point of your exercise here; but if it were, it does not in my opinion produce a practical starting five, given the options available.
No it is not. It is merely to list what you think will be the starting 5 might be and express your confidence around that. Folks are free to pick however they like.I don’t believe that choosing the actual Starting 5 is necessarily the point of your exercise here;
1) this is not a ranked choice vote per se. see item above.le. Also, just my opinion, but Rank Choice Voting, in similar fashion when attempting to choose political candidates is a horrible idea for elections just the same.