Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SimpleDawg, post: 3072280, member: 9267"] Ok, my bad with the South Carolina omission. But even with that, I think Mississippi State still has more better wins overall. SC and Notre Dame is what UConn has, but pretty blank after that. My overall point is that if people (not you specifically) short end us because of our SOS rank, you can do the same for UConn. If they short end us for lack of overall quality wins, you can do the same for UConn. If we go by recent play, I agree that we shouldn't jump anyone because we beat Arkansas, but Oregon has added losses recently which in my opinion should drop them below us. And if we also go by recent play, Stanford probably has the strongest claim than anyone that they should move up. And this is just my opinion not trying to be argumentative, but imo only Baylor and Notre Dame should be CLEAR #1 seeds. I think there are arguments against everyone else. For Louisville, it's a shaky tournament run. For Oregon, it's those recent losses. For Stanford, it's because of the hole they dug with the early losses. For UConn, it's lack of overall quality wins. For Mississippi State it's beating Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, LSU, Arkansas, and Tennessee as 5 out of our last 7 wins, which is nothing special I agree. Thanks for clarifying anyways. ... [/QUOTE]