- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,276
- Reaction Score
- 2,943
I think that is the essence of the evaluation UConn has to do before they decide to sue or not. I say they should. I cannot imagine how banning the team from postseason by retroactively applying a new rule can stand up.I'm sorry, but I'm one who thinks that UConn should not sue the NCAA. Why drag this out any further? Unless UConn has an ironclad case against the NCAA (which I don't think is the case), then why sue them. Let this thing die. Accept the penalty. Whatever. We'll do more damage by having an amazing team next year. It'll make the media turn right around and say "why can't UConn be in when none of their current players attributed to the APR disaster?"
But otherwise, let this thing die. Maybe the NCAA is corrupt, but eventually they'll fall apart. This isn't the silver bullet that will destroy the NCAA. Accept our fate and move on. It's one year. Think about it, at least it isn't the USC football situation...
You're right that the horrible injustice being carried out next year may work more in our favor than a lawsuit, but I'm not sure where that balance is.