Strongly worded Big 12 expansion article | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Strongly worded Big 12 expansion article

Status
Not open for further replies.

UCFBfan

Semi Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
5,874
Reaction Score
11,756
I can understand why many Big 12 schools would want status quo. Not guaranteed to strike it rich with whoever you add and things are decent as they stand now. However, I can't understand why those schools would not be crapping their pants at the thought of making OU unhappy. Outside of Texas, OU is the biggest name in that conference. I can't imagine that if the Big 12 decides against expansion that OU won't be knocking on the doors of the SEC or B1G the next day. Not saying they'd get in but I can't see why they wouldn't be bolting the second they could.

This isn't a school president from Texas Tech making all this racket. It's the president of OU. Just makes me wonder what the other school think is going to happen if they stay put.

This is also assuming that other schools not named Texas are against expansion.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
7,188
Reaction Score
8,763
I can understand why many Big 12 schools would want status quo. Not guaranteed to strike it rich with whoever you add and things are decent as they stand now. However, I can't understand why those schools would not be crapping their pants at the thought of making OU unhappy. Outside of Texas, OU is the biggest name in that conference. I can't imagine that if the Big 12 decides against expansion that OU won't be knocking on the doors of the SEC or B1G the next day. Not saying they'd get in but I can't see why they wouldn't be bolting the second they could.

This isn't a school president from Texas Tech making all this racket. It's the president of OU. Just makes me wonder what the other school think is going to happen if they stay put.

This is also assuming that other schools not named Texas are against expansion.

Agree there. Texas will do whatever is in their best interest. Right now, it looks to be to keep the XII in once piece, at least for the short-term. If Oklahoma bolts, that significantly impacts that value that the XII provides U Texas and in turn, the Long Horns bolt. While Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and maybe OK St have landing places outside of the XII, the rest may not. Thus, the other 6 programs, which are a majority, should be supporting with their dying breath Oklahoma's wishes.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,628
Reaction Score
13,671
I can understand why many Big 12 schools would want status quo. Not guaranteed to strike it rich with whoever you add and things are decent as they stand now. However, I can't understand why those schools would not be crapping their pants at the thought of making OU unhappy. Outside of Texas, OU is the biggest name in that conference. I can't imagine that if the Big 12 decides against expansion that OU won't be knocking on the doors of the SEC or B1G the next day. Not saying they'd get in but I can't see why they wouldn't be bolting the second they could.

This isn't a school president from Texas Tech making all this racket. It's the president of OU. Just makes me wonder what the other school think is going to happen if they stay put.

This is also assuming that other schools not named Texas are against expansion.
I've been saying this for 5 years now.
If we get in ,any post CR evaluation of the success or failures of teams, UConn probably won't even be discussed because it will have been accepted as such a no brainer that no one will be able to take credit for us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
43
Guests online
827
Total visitors
870

Forum statistics

Threads
157,854
Messages
4,123,909
Members
10,014
Latest member
so1
Top Bottom