Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Dogdeacon, post: 2758727, member: 1026"]
I don't see how anyone who is a UConn fan could be arguing Ollie's side at this point:

A. 'The principal' - aka do the right thing. Ollie from every account was not working hard, results indisputable, evidence via player comments continues to build. There is no argument that UConn has an obligation to honor a contract that was not being honored. Its harder to win a lawsuit or cancel a contract based on poor performance vs cause, but legally you use any and everything you can. That's business, life - and it is MORE fair & principled not to pay someone who wasn't doing their job. ESPECIALLY when we are talking about new/future dollars that UConn now has to pay to a new coach.

B. There are violations. Yes every college program has skeletons, but that is a 10-year olds defense. There are NCAA and contract, university policy violations.

C. UConn has a new coach and a path forward. There is no argument about reputation not repudiated by hiring the right head coach for UConn moving forward. Reputation is all about our current coach, program and our next game/season.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach