Are you kidding me with these announcers???
Is it the Jody Conradt show or are they gonna call the game?????
Very unimressed by the male. He didn't know how to pronounce Ogwumike. No excuse.
I'm not sure what was worse, the announcing or the play by Texas.
I don't feel like Texas has anything to be ashamed of. That announcer , however, did.Very unimressed by the male. He didn't know how to pronounce Ogwumike. No excuse.
I'm not sure what was worse, the announcing or the play by Texas.
No disrespect to Tara's resume, but Geno's is more impressive.
I think the academic piece of the recruiting equation both helps and hurts Stanford. Sure the academic rigor precludes some kids being able to come, but a lot of kids will come in a heartbeat for the chance at a Stanford degree.Well sure, based on National Championships, but if you consider Stanford's tough admissions, Tara has WAY over achieved, and consistently so over the years. If Geno was at Stanford, he'd still win, but not as many NC's, because he wouldn't have had as many good players, namely Taurasi.
you can read a 5 part Q&A series with Tara and Amy on the bootleg (free) about the recruiting process.
http://stanford.scout.com/2/863136.html
I think the academic piece of the recruiting equation both helps and hurts Stanford. Sure the academic rigor precludes some kids being able to come, but a lot of kids will come in a heartbeat for the chance at a Stanford degree.
Absolutely, Geno would likely have the same limitations, but if he had two Ogwumike sisters on a team, I think he wins a national championship. Eight NCs? Maybe not. More than two? perhaps...
Actually, I found the conversation with Jody quite interesting. The game, not as much.Are you kidding me with these announcers???
Is it the Jody Conradt show or are they gonna call the game?????
Thanks for posting that - I have always felt that Stanford men's teams are the most disadvantaged because HS men have been underperforming women for a long time academically and while I haven't see a study I believe among athletes the numbers much be even more skewed. I am impressed with the general level of academic achievement of women college athletes and on WCBB teams in particular - they do have the advantage of not being tempted to leave early as the rules don't permit it in many women's pro sport leagues and the financial incentive is so much smaller.Well sure, based on National Championships, but if you consider Stanford's tough admissions, Tara has WAY over achieved, and consistently so over the years. If Geno was at Stanford, he'd still win, but not as many NC's, because he wouldn't have had as many good players, namely Taurasi.
you can read a 5 part Q&A series with Tara and Amy on the bootleg (free) about the recruiting process.
http://stanford.scout.com/2/863136.html
I think they should have won anyway. That loss is purely on Tara. Playing a crippled Appel hurt the team, they were doing much better and had built their lead with her on the bench but for some reason Tara chose to play her anyway. It was with Appel on the floor that Uconn made its's runs. Appel clearly was not capable of the performance she had in the previous game. She left if all on the floor and that game aggravated her injury and she couldn't get any elevation and missed a lot of bunnies against Uconn. Her depleted lack of mobility hurt the team defensively also. Tara should have seen that and pulled her out long before she finally did. It was so obvious. It was like her brain switched off.Sure the lure of Stanford helps, but not everyone who wants to go to Stanford, gets in. Read the Q&A with Tara to get the picture of their smaller pool and the time involved recruiting a student/athlete at Stanford. Stanford could have won with AN O sister (Nneka) in San Antonio had Appel been healthy. We should have won in Indy though, still pissed about that, but it is guard's game in the F4 and NC, we were short of good pgs.