Apparently there's no consistent logic to the votes...it's all subjective.
ND beats us by 1 point in our house and leap frogs us by a spot. I don't disagree with that logic. Now Cal beats Stanford by 12 points in Maples and neither passes Stanford in the poll, nor moves up even one spot???
That's the first time I've seen Cal this year and was impressed. If that's the real Cal, then they're better than Kentucky, who I've seen a handful of times this season.
It always has been subjective and not worth either credit to or worrying about.
It always has been subjective and not worth either credit to or worrying about.
So then why bother responding?
Some of us do find it interesting.
I was responding to Replicant not you. He noted the lack of apparent logic. I didn't say anyone shouldn't look at them or not enjoy doing so simply voiced an opinion that they deserve minimal credit or valadity and aren't worth worrying about. I felt such a response was within the realm of reasonable.So then why bother responding?
Some of us do find it interesting.
Apparently there's no consistent logic to the votes...it's all subjective.
ND beats us by 1 point in our house and leap frogs us by a spot. I don't disagree with that logic. Now Cal beats Stanford by 12 points in Maples and neither passes Stanford in the poll, nor moves up even one spot???
That's the first time I've seen Cal this year and was impressed. If that's the real Cal, then they're better than Kentucky, who I've seen a handful of times this season.
I was responding to Replicant not you. He noted the lack of apparent logic. I didn't say anyone shouldn't look at them or not enjoy doing so simply voiced an opinion that they deserve minimal credit or valadity and aren't worth worrying about. I felt such a response was within the realm of reasonable.
I was responding to Replicant not you. He noted the lack of apparent logic. I didn't say anyone shouldn't look at them or not enjoy doing so simply voiced an opinion that they deserve minimal credit or valadity and aren't worth worrying about. I felt such a response was within the realm of reasonable
I had considered that, but felt the Cal victory was so impressive and fresh on voters minds that it would at least move them up a spot. After all, that was the first time any PAC-12 team had defeated Stanford at Maples in approx. a decade. Should have been worthy of a some reward IMO.Not completely logical, but not crazy either. Due to the wacky Pac12 schedule Stanford beat Cal @ Cal the previous game so they've split their series. I can understand why voters would still vote Stanford higher. ND/UConn was only 1 meeting. If they faced each other back to back and split I would think the team that started higher would remain there.
Apparently there's no consistent logic to the votes...it's all subjective.
ND beats us by 1 point in our house and leap frogs us by a spot. I don't disagree with that logic. Now Cal beats Stanford by 12 points in Maples and neither passes Stanford in the poll, nor moves up even one spot???
That's the first time I've seen Cal this year and was impressed. If that's the real Cal, then they're better than Kentucky, who I've seen a handful of times this season.
Duke will get the 1 seed out West and face Stanford.I can completely understand why Stanford is still ahead of Cal. They do have more scalps on their resume (Baylor and Tenn), and they split last week. Hopefully they will meet again in the Pac 12 tournament with the winner getting either the #1 or #2 seed out West.
Explain how Kentucky beats #20 TA&M at home by 3 and is rewarded with a bump, while Cal beats #3 Stanford away by 12 and gets no love?I can completely understand why Stanford is still ahead of Cal. They do have more scalps on their resume (Baylor and Tenn), and they split last week. Hopefully they will meet again in the Pac 12 tournament with the winner getting either the #1 or #2 seed out West.
I agree. Other #1's are UConn, Baylor and ND. Other #2's look like KY, Maryland and maybeDuke will get the 1 seed out West and face Stanford.
Duke will get the 1 seed out West and face Stanford.
I agree. Other #1's are UConn, Baylor and ND. Other #2's look like KY, Maryland and maybe
LV's.
No argument from me. I think LV's will falter as well. So #2's look like Stanford, Cal, PSU and KY.Maryland is gonna falter.... they have two more regular season losses coming to them at the hands of the blue devils.... and they also have to go on the road to face FSU. They will lose at least 3 more times before the ACC tourney.
No argument from me. So #2's look like Stanford, Cal, PSU and KY.
Some good team will get stuck with Cal or Stanford out West.Meh..... how bout we get the #1 in Norfolk and let Stanford get the #2 and fly them fly east for a change
Cal has had decent (to good) recruiting classes recently. 2009 #4, 2010 #12, 2011 #7. They have some good players. They should be making some waves.That's the first time I've seen Cal this year and was impressed. If that's the real Cal, then they're better than Kentucky, who I've seen a handful of times this season.