Boston pushed the Stanford into the lane and refs negated the FT. Put that one away for the future -- push your opponent into the lane in close games.The end of the game Stanford did not play smart.
What do the rules say about that? Hard to tell if Boston pushed her, leaned on her, gave her a nudge, whatever, but let's say she did and the refs acknowledge it, what happens then?Boston pushed the Stanford into the lane and refs negated the FT. Put that one away for the future -- push your opponent into the lane in close games.
Nothing.What do the rules say about that? Hard to tell if Boston pushed her, leaned on her, gave her a nudge, whatever, but let's say she did and the refs acknowledge it, what happens then?
Hull should have been pulled. She didn't have a prayer against Henderson. Too slow.Refs missed a couple calls against SC.
In the end SC was too physical (bigs) and too fast (guards) for Stanford.
Dead ball foul. They have rules to cover that.What do the rules say about that? Hard to tell if Boston pushed her, leaned on her, gave her a nudge, whatever, but let's say she did and the refs acknowledge it, what happens then?
Stanford had 20 turnovers to S.C. having 7....that was the biggest difference.
You are not living it reality. Boston gets the same calls Griner and Dela Done get's because they are tall and don't go out of their way to foul. You are predisposed against her so you see her as fouling but she is really not.Dead ball foul. They have rules to cover that.
I believe they call a foul on Boston. Correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t believe that negates the 2nd foul shot by the shooter. She takes her second shot, then Belibi takes her two shots if Stanford was in the bonus.What do the rules say about that? Hard to tell if Boston pushed her, leaned on her, gave her a nudge, whatever, but let's say she did and the refs acknowledge it, what happens then?
Replay showed no clear evidence of a push, only a lean, and Bielibi bit on the lean. maybe a light push on the back, that's all it takes, but you don't get a clear view of suchBoston pushed the Stanford into the lane and refs negated the FT. Put that one away for the future -- push your opponent into the lane in close games.
Yeah that’s a mature way of looking at the situation.Let's see, Stanford loses to a higher ranked team, so they should now automatically, and without fanfare, be moved to eleventh in the polls. After all they lose to s.carolina and have 3 losses. This is the new norm now i would guess.
all Boston did was box her out Belibi is responsible for her own actionsI believe they call a foul on Boston. Correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t believe that negates the 2nd foul shot by the shooter. She takes her second shot, then Belibi takes her two shots if Stanford was in the bonus.
Henderson had 7 steals and 17 points and played smartStanford had 20 turnovers to S.C. having 7....that was the biggest difference.
Only reason anyone is talking about it was because ESPN brought it up and kept showing the replay which raised an interesting question. No one is blaming Boston. I thought Belibi just got over her skis so to speak.you are seriously trying to blame Boston for Belebi stepping into the lane first, you are nuts?