That is Mike Anderson's MO. Press full court, score off turnovers, run, poor half court offense.Their offense looked like a bunch of headless chickens running around with Champagnie there to save the day. It's going to take them a while to figure that out since 90% of the team is brand new
That was my takeaway as well. The only player on the floor who looks polished is Champagnie and the bigs look weak in the paint. They had 15 turnovers as a team and most of them were unforced.Their offense looked like a bunch of headless chickens running around with Champagnie there to save the day. It's going to take them a while to figure that out since 90% of the team is brand new
I've seen his teams play solid half-court O - but its more of a strategic decision for them. They know most teams are built to play with order, and there is just a lot of value in creating an entire court full of disorder - where they have a no-doubt advantage.That is Mike Anderson's MO. Press full court, score off turnovers, run, poor half court offense.
Anderson has19 straight winning seasons - hard to argue with that statThat is Mike Anderson's MO. Press full court, score off turnovers, run, poor half court offense.
Goodman hated the hire and was obnoxiously bashing it (believe he wanted Cluess for them which would have been a disaster because of health), but I think a lot of folks here actually did like it at the time. Hes turning around Mullin’s mess pretty quickly. He’s an underrated coach. Arkansas isn’t an easy gig but he did a good job there too, and made it attractive enough for Musselman to take the job, which he wouldn’t have previously.I feel we slept on Saint John's hiring Mike Anderson. It felt like a few of the other searches they have done or others (thinking USF or UMass): somewhat of a Random Walk. Anderson actually has had great years interspersed with others in a 19 year HC career. He knows the recruits that fit. And that means he is often gonna be better than the Newby's at Butler or Xavier or Pat Ewing. I hope he gets better and better for the Johnnies ... because I think I love to beat them and want them to be good when they get waxed. NYC is fun when you see their fans cry.
Champaganie is very fun to watch. Had 30 and didn't rush at all. Very composed and even-keeled even when it looked like the game was about to get away from St John's.I hate them but they barely lost in Indiana last night. Mathis tossed on a #2 technical shoulda been a #1. I see a tough out with them.
no. make that heck, no.It just hit me, Anderson is what we are hoping for out of Mora. A coaching professional that knows what needs to be done and how to do it.
The IU crowd reminded me what a college crowd is like. It was nice to see. St John's handled it very well.Creative chanting of "Sloppy seconds!" toward SJ player who's dating IU player's ex. Hit 'em where it hurts. I like it.
You mean we beat them in the Big East Final with Posh missing a shot at the end?While UConn should have the size/skill/experience advantage in any matchup vs the Johnnie's, my gut tells me that Posh is the new Peyton Siva.
IOW Husky kryptonite.
And, for all the starry eyed Boneyard recruiting experts, Champagnie was a 3 star recruit.....Champaganie is very fun to watch. Had 30 and didn't rush at all. Very composed and even-keeled even when it looked like the game was about to get away from St John's.
Siva was 6-1 vs UConn in his career. Even in that one loss, 7 boards, 7 assists, 13 pts. And Preston Knowles isn't Champagnie.You mean we beat them in the Big East Final with Posh missing a shot at the end?