nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 46,802
- Reaction Score
- 40,061
Duke, Virginia and Florida are wildly overrated, and Louisville is probably 5-7 slots too high.
Agreed. Wisconsin and Duke I think should be the top 2 teams early next year. Wisconsin definitely top 5 all year next year I think.
It's a similar effect to when they rise several spots in the polls after a loss.Please explain to me how Duke will be better by losing their two best players, one of whom is a Top 3 pick.
It's a similar effect to when they rise several spots in the polls after a loss.
It's a Duke thing.
nelsonmuntz said:Please explain to me how Duke will be better by losing their two best players, one of whom is a Top 3 pick.
I'm sure Okafor will make an immediate big impact. Not as sure about Jones. But I agree they should not be rated that high. Fine with me though. I won't mind reading those articles next year about what a disappointment Duke has been.I will go a step further and say that I think Parker was an absolutely awesome player this year, and by far the best player on that team. Without him and Hood, I think the team is a bubble team at best. They are bringing in some recruits, and maybe 1 or 2 of them can play, but Parker is a huge, huge loss on a team that wasn't exactly dominant with him.
Come on. You bring in two Top 10 recruits and surround them with something other than scrubs and you're better than a bubble team. You're saying this for effect, right?I will go a step further and say that I think Parker was an absolutely awesome player this year, and by far the best player on that team. Without him and Hood, I think the team is a bubble team at best. They are bringing in some recruits, and maybe 1 or 2 of them can play, but Parker is a huge, huge loss on a team that wasn't exactly dominant with him.
Come on. You bring in two Top 10 recruits and surround them with something other than scrubs and you're better than a bubble team. You're saying this for effect, right?
My own fault for trying to have a reasonable discussion with you. Won't happen again.Are you one of those guys that things every recruit is better than guys that have played D1 ball for 3 years?
You are right the loss of Daniels will be a big hole . But in all honesty what do you know facey will contribute ? He is different than Daniels , older for a sophomore . He is a flat out better athlete. His small sample of exceptional rebounding prowess might be the real deal . From his position he needs to just pick n pop well, rebound and defend.There's plenty of depth in the backcourt, but of the frontcourt players, none has ever been an impact player, one is a relatively unheralded freshman, and three have serious foul issues. I have pretty significant concerns about frontcourt depth.
I'm sure Okafor will make an immediate big impact. Not as sure about Jones. But I agree they should not be rated that high. Fine with me though. I won't mind reading those articles next year about what a disappointment Duke has been.
I think my biggest question is how purvis is integrated , how talented is he at pnr's and creating a shot? I'm guessing he is being groomed as a high usage guy we set high screens for. He's shown none of that to this date of his career, but has potential to be elite at it. I already know hell bring it on d
Boat to purv lobs , purv to boat lobs in half court. My head just explodedHe definitely can create his own shot from what I've seen, simply by getting to the rim. He just blows by guys. No idea about midrange though.
I'm more looking forward to him dunking on breakaway after breakaway.
Yeah but they bring back 2 starters from last year's scintillating team...#21 UTAH ????
Are they referring to the same team that put up 39 points against Arizona in the Pac 12 tournament and then got beat by an above average Saint Mary's team in the 1st round of the NIT?

Dorell wrights ( south Kents own) brother is the real deal for Utah. Should be an all American . Rest of the team is trash and they play literally nobody OOC.