Sporting News: Best Programs Since 2000 | The Boneyard

Sporting News: Best Programs Since 2000

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,761
Reaction Score
143,889
In case you don't want to go through the slideshow...

National championships: 8 points each
Final Four appearances: 4 points each
National championship appearances: 4 points each
Sporting News Player of the Year: 2 points each
Consensus First-Team All-Americans: 1 point per All-American
Overall winning percentage: Poll-style points from 15-1 for the top 15 schools. 15 points are given to the school with the highest-winning percentage; one point is given to the school with the 15th-best winning percentage.
Total NCAA tournament wins: Poll-style points
Total NBA Draft picks (since 2001 NBA Draft): Poll-style points 15-1

15. Maryland

Total score: 21.5
Final Fours: 2 (2001, 2002)
National championships: 1 (2002)
What they do best: Maryland made this list on the strength of back-to-back Final Four appearances and a national title under former coach Gary Williams. That gives Maryland the slight edge over the first five programs off this list: Texas, Butler, Gonzaga, Indiana and Illinois.
What’s next: Mark Turgeon guided the Terps to a 28-7 record in their first season in the Big Ten, which ended in the second round of the tournament. Maryland should continue to improve in its new surroundings.

14. Memphis

Total score: 23.5
Final Fours: 1 (2008)
What they do best: Since 2000-01, Memphis has the fifth-highest winning percentage in the NCAA at .759. That included a four-year run under John Calipari from 2005-09 where the Tigers went 61-1 in Conference USA play.
What’s next: Now in the American Athletic Conference, Memphis missed the tournament in 2014-15. Josh Pastner enters his seventh season with the program looking to get back to the Big Dance.

13. Ohio State

Total score: 27.5
Final Fours: 2 (2007, 2012)
What they do best: Thad Matta’s efforts at Ohio State are sometimes underappreciated, but he’s built a steady winner with the help of NBA talent. First-round NBA Draft picks Greg Oden, Mike Conley, Evan Turner, Jared Sullinger and D’Angelo Russell have kept Ohio State running.
What’s next: The Buckeyes have won at least 20 games in 11 straight seasons under Matta, but they haven’t advanced past the first weekend of the NCAA tournament in either of the last two seasons.

12. Arizona

Total score: 28.5
Final Fours: 1 (2001)
What they do best: The Wildcats produced 20 NBA Draft picks since 2001, including Richard Jefferson, Gilbert Arenas and Andre Iguodala. Sean Miller guided the Wildcats to back-to-back Elite Eight appearances the last two seasons.
What’s next: Miller’s next step is a Final Four appearance, which has eluded the Wildcats since they reached the NCAA championship game in 2001.

11. Wisconsin

Total score: 29
Final Fours: 2 (2014, 2015)
What they do best: Wisconsin leads Big Ten schools with a .734 winning percentage since 2000-01, ninth best in the NCAA. The Badgers have back-to-back Final Four appearances under Bo Ryan. Sporting News Player of the Year Frank Kaminsky led Wisconsin to the NCAA championship game in 2015.
What’s next: Now the question is how long Ryan sticks around. The Badgers are 66-12 the last two seasons. Ryan has left the door open as to whether or not he will return after 2015-16.

10. UCLA

Total score: 35
Final Fours: 3 (2006, 2007, 2008)
What they do best: Final Fours and NBA talent. The Bruins enjoyed three straight Final Four appearances from 2006-08, and UCLA has produced 22 NBA Draft picks since 2000-01. That includes Trevor Ariza, Kevin Love and Russell Westbrook. UCLA ranks 33rd in winning percentage since 2000-01 at .665.
What’s next: The Bruins have reached the Sweet 16 each of the last two seasons under Steve Alford, but expectations are always higher for a program that hasn’t won the NCAA championship since 1995.

9. Louisville

Total score: 37.5
Final Fours: 3 (2005, 2012, 2013)
National championship: 2013
What they do best: Rick Pitino continues to win big at Louisville, and the Cardinals rank 11th in the nation in winning percentage since 2000-01. Louisville won the NCAA tournament in 2013. The Cardinals have reached the Elite Eight six times under Pitino.
What’s next: The Cardinals maintained success while playing in four different conferences under Pitino. Expect more NBA talent to come in with the move to the ACC.

8. Michigan State

Total score: 42
Final Fours: 5 (2001, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2015)
What they do best: Reach the Final Four. This list starts with the 2000-01 season, one year after the Spartans won the NCAA championship. The Spartans reached the Final Four five times since, more than any other school. Tom Izzo has guided the Spartans to 34 NCAA tournament wins in that stretch.
What’s next: Expect more of the same. The Spartans rank 16th in winning percentage since 2000-01 at .713, but Izzo’s time-honored method of getting Michigan State best-prepared for March works. The Spartans are the highest-ranked program without a national title in the last 15 years.

7. Syracuse

Total score: 44
Final Fours: 2 (2003, 2013)
National championship: 1 (2003)
What they do best: Syracuse ranks sixth in winning percentage since 2000-01, but that doesn’t account for the 108 wins vacated as a result of NCAA penalties levied last season. The school has produced 16 NBA Draft picks since 2000-01. Carmelo Anthony led the Orange to a national championship in 2003.
What’s next: Syracuse and Boeheim enter uncharted territory with five-year probation levied by the NCAA. How will that affect the program long term?

6. Florida

Total score: 60
Final Fours: 3 (2006, 2007, 2014)
National championships: 2 (2006, 2007)
What they do best: The Gators are still the last team to repeat with back-to-back NCAA championships in 2006-07. Florida ranks seventh in winning percentage (.740) and NCAA tournament wins (28) in this stretch.
What’s next: The program’s stability will be tested now that Billy Donovan left to take an NBA job in Oklahoma City. Michael White takes over for the Gators.

5. North Carolina

Total score: 70
Final Fours: 3 (2005, 2008, 2009)
National championships: 2 (2005, 2009)
What they do best: The Tar Heels won two national championships under Roy Williams, and North Carolina has produced the third-most NBA first-round picks since 2000-01. Three-time consensus All-American Tyler Hansbrough remains the face of North Carolina’s Final Four runs in 2008-09.
What’s next: Williams signed a contract extension in the face of a notice of allegations from the NCAA. Will any punishment of North Carolina be doomed to fail?

4. UConn

Total score: 75
Final Fours: 4 (2004, 2009, 2011, 2014)
National championship: 3 (2004, 2011, 2014)
What they do best: Win national championships. Jim Calhoun led the Huskies to national titles in 2004 and 2011, and Kevin Ollie guided UConn to a run as a No. 7 seed to the national title in 2014. The Huskies rank 15th in winning percentage at .716 since 2000-01.
What’s next: Ollie’s second season didn’t go as well. UConn finished 20-15 and lost in the first round of the NIT.

3. Kentucky

Total score: 77
Final Fours: 4 (2011, 2012, 2014, 2015)
National championship: 1 (2012)
What they do best: John Calipari built a NBA superstore that produced the most NBA draft picks of any school since the 2001 NBA Draft, and Kentucky ranks fourth in winning percentage at (.765). With four Final Four appearances in the last five seasons, Kentucky isn’t slowing down any time soon.
What’s next: Considering the Wildcats nearly completed a perfect season and had six players drafted in 2014-15, it’s clear how high the standards are at Kentucky. Expect the good times to roll in Lexington.

2. Kansas

Total score: 82.5
Final Fours: 4 (2002, 2003, 2008, 2012)
National championship: 1 (2008)
What they do best: The by-definition steady program. Kansas has won the Big 12 regular-season title every year since 2005 and ranks second in the NCAA in winning percentage at .820. The Jayhawks are tied with Duke for most tournament wins in this stretch (38), and Kansas reached the NCAA championship game in 2003, 2008 and 2012.
What’s next: The Jayhawks have exited the NCAA tournament in the second round each of the last two seasons, with the latest coming to Wichita State. That’s increased the pressure. That’s the world Bill Self lives in.

1. Duke

Total score: 110.5
Final Fours: 4 (2001, 2004, 2010, 2015)
National championships: 3 (2001, 2010, 2015)
What they do best: It’s fitting that the 15 seasons tracked here start with a Duke championship in 2000-01 and end with another national title in March. Duke won its third national championship since 2000-01 last season, and the Blue Devils own a NCAA-best .831 winning percentage in that stretch. That run also includes nine Consensus First-Team All-Americans. Duke has it all under coach Mike Krzyzewski.
What’s next: What else could Duke do? A perfect season? Go back-to-back? Coach K last led the Blue Devils to consecutive national championships in 1991-92.
 

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,512
Reaction Score
51,537
"What’s next: Ollie’s second season didn’t go as well. UConn finished 20-15 and lost in the first round of the NIT." I remember a different outcome in Ollie's second season... This is when you know not to take this seriously.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,781
Reaction Score
98,010
Kansas? Hmmmm :eek:

Kentucky? Now a real numbers system would also have points for beating teams in this Top 15 in the FF wouldn't it? Which for us would include Duke once and UK twice.

Like JOllie said, #1 should be a toss up between our beloved and the Devils.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
5,147
Reaction Score
11,424
"What’s next: Ollie’s second season didn’t go as well. UConn finished 20-15 and lost in the first round of the NIT." I remember a different outcome in Ollie's second season... This is when you know not to take this seriously.

Someone must have e-mailed him because he updated it about an hour ago. Based on his metrics, number 4 isn't bad. Based on sports being about winning, number 4 is a joke.
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
15,603
Reaction Score
88,575
We've had this general discussion in different terms in many threads in the last year or so. The general consensus from these types of articles and from unbiased Yarders is that UConn's championships definitely weight heavily in this but they get knocked down some for the lack of consistency. Kansas and Duke have been more consistent and have overall had more dominating regular seasons. UConn hasn't won as many regular season championships in their conferences. That's illustrated in UConn's winning percentage since 2000 being 15th. While championships are definitely great and the ultimate goal I don't think you can totally dismiss the other 30-35 games during the season.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
6,090
Reaction Score
11,112
I think 4 isn't unjust or anything. Schools like Kansas, Kentucky, Duke make the tournament nearly every year and as high seeds not exactly something we can hang our hat on. We aren't the best regular season team by a long shot as witnessed by only the 15th best winning percentage in the time span. We do kick ass when it counts though.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,042
Reaction Score
6,590
if you want an even bigger laugh, look at his top 10 championship teams of the expanded bracket era. 99 huskies come in at 4th, and #1 was...08 kansas huh???

edit: nvm i was reading it backwards...assumed it was a countdown so instead 99 huskies in at #7
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
4,634
Reaction Score
9,910
What a joke. It should be a toss up for #1 between UConn and Duke. Then Kentucky #3. Kansas is straight garbage every year. It seems like they never make it past the first weekend in the tournament.
well Kansas made it to 4 final fours and 7 EE in the time span and made it to the second weekend 10 of the 15 years so maybe reconsider saying they are "straight garbage every year"
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,761
Reaction Score
143,889
They have out performed us in every metric except titles, granted its the most important one, but saying Kansas is "garbage" just lets me know I cannot take you seriously.
It's funny that there is an argument against those three programs above us who have won more consistently during the regular season while the majority of this board is longing for a dominant regular season that's been missing since 2008-2009 and a regular season championship that's been missing since 2005-2006.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
2,985
Reaction Score
9,300
well Kansas made it to 4 final fours and 7 EE in the time span and made it to the second weekend 10 of the 15 years so maybe reconsider saying they are "straight garbage every year"

Wow did not realize this. Still, they should win a lot more games with the talent they get year after year. I still hold my opinion that we should definitely be ranked higher than them since 2000. Kansas: 4 FF, 1 NC. UConn: 4 FF, 3 NC. The national championships speak for themselves.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
3,538
Reaction Score
10,184
Memories and by the numbers are different things. My memories of Kansas are losing to lesser teams. The numbers suggest they are really good...I prefer my memory.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,927
Reaction Score
14,362
well Kansas made it to 4 final fours and 7 EE in the time span and made it to the second weekend 10 of the 15 years so maybe reconsider saying they are "straight garbage every year"

My 2 cents....
You have to be careful when you say "4 FF and 7 EE".
Don't double dip. If you make the Final 4, it's sort of understood that you made the Elite 8.
So it's really "4 FF and 3 EE"
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,347
Reaction Score
31,271
Top 4 is great. If they weighted championships more, we would be even higher... Or if they stretched it back a year further. You can't really be disappointed to be considered as one of the top 4 programs, especially from where we were when JC arrived.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
4,634
Reaction Score
9,910
My 2 cents....
You have to be careful when you say "4 FF and 7 EE".
Don't double dip. If you make the Final 4, it's sort of understood that you made the Elite 8.
So it's really "4 FF and 3 EE"
Yes, but if you look at a listing of years a team made the EE it includes the years they advanced past it.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,042
Reaction Score
6,590
Wow did not realize this. Still, they should win a lot more games with the talent they get year after year. I still hold my opinion that we should definitely be ranked higher than them since 2000. Kansas: 4 FF, 1 NC. UConn: 4 FF, 3 NC. The national championships speak for themselves.
Kansas has also won the big12 reg season title 12 years in a row...so i think they're winning plenty, and don't be cliche and say "they're not winning when it counts." They've been to just as many FF's as us in that span, and had more tourney appearances overall. Winning that NC game is a huge step, and we've been lucky to have elite college guards like kemba, bazz, and boat to get us over the hump.

I have no problem with where he put us on the list. If we want to push the debate for a higher spot in our favor we need to be more consistent each year and start winning some regular season trophies as well. No question the NC is a 1000x more important, but it's a crap shoot every year to win the NCAA (who knows who you'll run into, and who's getting hot at the right time, etc). Much more straightforward to win a regular season title or conf tourney since you know what you're going to run into so we need to start doing that as many people on here are starting to harp on
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,761
Reaction Score
143,889
Wow did not realize this. Still, they should win a lot more games with the talent they get year after year. I still hold my opinion that we should definitely be ranked higher than them since 2000. Kansas: 4 FF, 1 NC. UConn: 4 FF, 3 NC. The national championships speak for themselves.
Kansas has also been to 26 straight NCAAs, the longest active streak. It's more than just national championships.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,957
Reaction Score
5,401
My 2 cents....
You have to be careful when you say "4 FF and 7 EE".
Don't double dip. If you make the Final 4, it's sort of understood that you made the Elite 8.
So it's really "4 FF and 3 EE"

This is just semantics but I disagree with you on his. How many times did Kansas make the elite 8 during the period in question? Seven times.

UConn is a bad example because we tend to win the whole thing when we make it to the Final Four, but a lot of schools consider the Final Four enough of a milestone to hang banners honoring the teams that made it that far. If we had such a banner, there would be five teams listed on it, not one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
317
Guests online
2,177
Total visitors
2,494

Forum statistics

Threads
159,073
Messages
4,179,237
Members
10,050
Latest member
MTSuitsky


.
Top Bottom