My interpretation of the "Tiffany Hayes question" is as follows:
- Tiff took on a role of starter as a freshman, a relative rarity, and had standout moments in that capacity, including in the NCAA tourney, on an historically great team.
- As a sophomore, she was a starter on another historically great team.
- At this point, with Rene two years removed from UConn, Tina graduated, and Caroline injured, it was assumed she could take the next step as a player and be a strong second banana to Maya Moore. Again, she showed tantalizing flashes, but the strong second banana role didn't quite materialize. And when Maya didn't get much help in the national semis loss, Tiff as the lone upperclasswoman of the other four starters definitely bore the brunt of fan disappointment, especially in light of poor performances against Baylor and Stanford earlier that year.
- Even though she has improved as a senior, she won't have the Huskies of Honor kind of a career it looked like she might.
In sum, she's not really guilty of anything other than not living up to many fans' expectations of her. But there is an understandable perception that perhaps her career at UConn could have been more than it was. By contrast, Kelly Faris will be adored because the sense will be that she got everything she could out of her ability.
It took me some time, but I came to be at peace with Tiff's career. Maybe her ceiling was exactly what she's doing now: occasionally brilliant, sometimes off and too wound up, always works her tail off. I guess I'd rather she have been occasionally brilliant than never at all, even if it meant she sometimes made me believe that consistent brilliance was within her grasp. In any event, her gifts are hers to do as she chooses, and I can only be a passive observer.