Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="KryHavok, post: 4768265, member: 12905"] And we likely won't. They chose to be discreet and professional, it backfired. They needed to be vocal and get the message out that an invite was in both parties' interests. Instead, silence, which can be interpreted as a sign of weakness. But that's not all, there was also weakness to improve up the offense. Weakness in addressing the bad tackling. Weakness in blitzing the QB and stopping 20+ yard run plays. Weakness to drill into receivers and defensive backs to catch the damn ball. Weakness to tell special teams that starting deep in our end of the field almost every frigging possession hampers the ability to score (catch, run, and get some decent field position). Weakness to stop passing stupid slants for 2-3 yards when 9-15 yards are needed. Weakness to protect the ball at all times to limit fumbles. And importantly, weakness to fire the damn coaches that can't seem to understand the above weaknesses needed to be fixed last month!!! The loss to USU was horrible but tolerable as the team battled. The last two losses to FIU and now USF have utterly pi$$ed me off. I'm no fair weather fan; as a son of the Nutmeg state, I loved UConn before I went there and moreso after I got my degree. What I'm hearing week in and week out makes me almost think that in some part, "they" (not sure who but someone in the administration) don't want football to succeed. [/QUOTE]