Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ConwayGmck, post: 3828670, member: 10442"] So what I am saying is this: a CT fan creates this thread for the sole purpose to point out to one and all that he doesn't think much of South Carolina. OK, that's fine - he also predicted that CT would beat Arkansas by dbl digits so we now know the extent of his prevision skills. Then another CT fan - you - added your post in response to someone else posting the simple fact that USC scored 62 points in the 2nd half alone against Arkansas: Arkansas scored 90 points against CT. CT scored fewer than 104 points against Arkansas. No one here stated that USC would score 104 pts against CT, but based on YOUR logic applied here, they seem to have a better chance of doing that against CT than they had against Arkansas. But the point is, USC doesn't HAVE to score 104 pts against CT, so what is YOUR point? Besides starting a strawman argument that wasn't called for? You say Arkansas scored "at will" against USC - they shot 45% against us, but shot 52% against CT. Scored 82 against us, but scored 90 against CT. If 45% is "at will" what would 52% be considered? South Carolina is right with or right behind Arkansas in leading the SEC in scoring offense, and shoots at a slightly higher rate of efficiency overall than Arkansas does. And I had an aunt that was a professor of nursing at USC, and I started attending Gamecock games in 1972, which I believe is 2 years before Rizzotti was born, so....nice to have this discussion with another longtime college sports fan...... [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,479

Messages: 4,397,779

Members: 10,211

Latest member: MurrDog