South Carolina Game Thread

[calpedaler]

You know, to all you people responding to this post, I was responding to a post by RSHERMVIKES. I was not talking to ANY of you. I believe RSHERMVIKES understands the post. Don't respond to a post unless you have all the information. I was not complaining about the decisions Geno made. However, there were posters who posted they were concerned when the team slowed the pace. Why did you not respond to those posts? By the way calpedaler, I'm laughing at you.

Thanks

 

[CocoHusky]

You know, to all you people responding to this post, I was responding to a post by RSHERMVIKES. I was not talking to ANY of you. I believe RSHERMVIKES understands the post. Don't respond to a post unless you have all the information. I was not complaining about the decisions Geno made. However, there were posters who posted they were concerned when the team slowed the pace. Why did you not respond to those posts? By the way calpedaler, I'm laughing at you.

LOL. Kind of NOT how this posting thing works though. When you post you are talking to everyone. If any us really had ALL the information that person would not have a need to post. A difference of opinion is a darn good thing.

 

[donalddoowop]

LOL. Kind of NOT how this posting thing works though. When you post you are talking to everyone. If any us really had ALL the information that person would not have a need to post. A difference of opinion is a darn good thing.

I was referring to ALL the information related to my post, not information taken out of context. If you had read the post to which I originally responded, you would see that your post was not necessary. It is possible to have all the information related to a particular post if that post was a response to another post. READ ALL posts involved.

 

[CocoHusky]

I was referring to ALL the information related to my post, not information taken out of context. If you had read the post to which I originally responded, you would see that your post was not necessary. It is possible to have all the information related to a particular post if that post was a response to another post. READ ALL posts involved.

Unfortunately I have ADD and lack the ... what were you saying again, Oh yea,- all the information. I am still laughing too hard at myself- I think , can I get back to you on this tomorrow? maybe. #notthatserious#

 

[bags27]

Unfortunately I have ADD and lack the ... what were you saying again, Oh yea,- all the information. I am still laughing too hard at myself- I think , can I get back to you on this tomorrow? maybe. #notthatserious#

seems to be what I'm saying more and more these days...for me at least, the senior citizen's moment has turned into my general waking state....

 

[HoopsFan21]

I just rewatched the game and they mentioned a stat at the start that UConn is 95-7 when facing the #2 ranked team. Does this sound right to you guys? Maybe I misinterpreted the stat, but go back and rewatch it and you'll see the graphic with Mo and Stewie with the text above their picture saying "UCONN: 95-7 all-time vs. #2 ranked teams."

 

[MilfordHusky]

I just rewatched the game and they mentioned a stat at the start that UConn is 95-7 when facing the #2 ranked team. Does this sound right to you guys? Maybe I misinterpreted the stat, but go back and rewatch it and you'll see the graphic with Mo and Stewie with the text above their picture saying "UCONN: 95-7 all-time vs. #2 ranked teams."

Nope. Doesn't sound right. I doubt they have played the #2 team anywhere near that number of times. Maybe it is the record against top 10 teams who are lower ranked??