- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 2,978
- Reaction Score
- 15,170
Why was there no replay evaluation of the TD by Syracuse in OT?
Sources: ACC ref quits over handling of Syracuse-UConn review
- Thread starter huskymedic
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 97,996
- Reaction Score
- 386,786
Sure getting its share of coverage:
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction Score
- 544
It's not like the play was questionable and they just took their time in deciding whether to review. Live, it looked like possibly a fumble, but the one quick replay they showed, it was clearly incomplete. There was zero reason that play should have been reviewed.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 28,536
- Reaction Score
- 41,140
It was absolutely bizarre, irregular and rogue in nature.
FfldCntyFan
Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 14,477
- Reaction Score
- 54,738
The booth gave Syracuse an additional play when there was really no valid reason for it.
The long (far longer than any video view could justify) killed the momementum our defense had and allowed Syracuse the opportunity to regroup their offense.
If that review doesn't happen, it's third and ten, Syracuse runs the ball, then punts and we go into halftime 14-3.
The long (far longer than any video view could justify) killed the momementum our defense had and allowed Syracuse the opportunity to regroup their offense.
If that review doesn't happen, it's third and ten, Syracuse runs the ball, then punts and we go into halftime 14-3.
The review process by the ACC is unconscionable. They only review if they think it benefit the ACC team. The multiple reviews of the targeting call in the Duke game 2 years ago, the terrible spot in the Wake Forest last years leading us to call a pass play on 3rd short because we thought we had a first down and the refusal to review the nonfumble call or the juggling touchdown in the Cuse game are all very clear examples!