- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,776
- Reaction Score
- 1,381
No doubt that BC FB and BB have both sucked for the last 3 years but the rest of your post makes no sense. We do not have "greater resources to provide a better experience" In addition our conference affiliation is worse. BC coach to prospect: "Son come to play at a school in the ACC located 10 miles from downtown Boston." Uconn coach to prospect: "Son come to play at a school in the NNNBE in Storrs." Look at their OOC FB schedule over the last few years and over the next few years. Compare it with ours. Guess who travels to more interesting places. I grant you that in the NNNBE our team will be able to travel to a lot of new places, but traveling long distances with short turnarounds to play SDSU and the others will hardly be a big selling point. Not trying to be a BC booster but, C'mon man use your head a little.I didn't say the place was in need of repair. I said they struggle to keep up because their pockets aren't as deep. Sooner or later, that struggle will likely take a toll. As evidence, I offered a rather weak travel budget BC seems to have adopted. Kids like to travel, experience new things, experience others won't. Recuits won't rate that a positive or even a neutral. People try to hang onto the status quo for as long as possible but once they have to downgrade, the snowball begins to roll.
The question was how does BC and Cuse compare to UConn athletically. BC seems to have fallen on bad times recently. That, of course, is nothing new. I just submit that their path back to relevance is tougher that would be ours because we have greater resources to provide a better experience.