Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="my2cents, post: 3866658, member: 7898"] My teachers of statistics taught me that small sample sizes lead to bad conclusions. On this board, many comments are made about shooting slumps that are based on , just that...one or two games and few shots. The general consensus is that an excellent shooters numbers would be 50/40/80....50% from 2's, 40% from 3's and 80% from the foul lime. Diana Taurasi's career numbers were 47%/ 39%/82%....and we would all acknowledge what an offensive force she was. Paige's last game she was 5/12 Total, 1/5 from 3's.....A slump? Hardly, if she made ONE more three, she would have been 6/12 (50%), and 2/5 (40%.) one missed shot does not make a slump. Same with CW, she had two below avg. games...a major slump...but prior to [/QUOTE]