Silver: Eight Years of Offensive Struggles | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Silver: Eight Years of Offensive Struggles

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are there other coaches that can do it? Recruit to build a complete, nationally competitive division 1 football program in New England? Sure. But they have to want to come to UCONN too you know. That's a big part of the hiring process.

have a nice day all.
 
Or......people don't want to say recruiting has improved until these kids actually see the field.

These are all opinions Dan.

Yes, these are all opinions. I've heard a lot about how stars and RR's don't matter. And yet somehow the teams with a lot of higher star rankings seem to be in the top25 every year.

At the very least, the people here can admit to Carl that third-party recruiting opinions are supporting Carl's opinion of Pasqualoni's recruiting upgrade, right? But I doubt we'll even see that... :rolleyes:
 
Thanks Dan. I'm glad somebody is paying attention. Pasqualoni's legacy at UCONN, and his legacy for college football in our part of the country in general, has nothing to do with wins and losses. Our ability to be successful in the future, hinges on our ability to establish and maintain the personal connections in recruiting that it takes to build pipelines that lead to UCONN. The beauty of our oncampus facilities, is not in what it provides for the team to practice in bad weather, it's what we can do with our campus, when it comes to recruiting entire high school and prep school football programs to have UCONN become a destination school. The more players we pump into the NFL, the better.

It would be much less important, if our recruiters, were ablt to show up on the doorstep of a kid, with the media power and the influence that wearing Big10 colors, and giving the pitch of playing in front of 100,000 people in Ohio or Michigan or Pennsylvania brings.

But we don't have that, so we need something else that works, and Pasqualoni, is one of the very few coaches left, that know what it takes, to build in this area of the country. He's got to pass that knowledge down to a younger generation of coaches, and I hope that we've got them on staff now.
Carl great points. Although it is debatable to what point recruiting has improved or not the man must be given credit just for keeping it on the same level and not having it drop to the bottom. This conference has been decimated like the black knight in the holy grail. We are turning in very strong recruiting classes despite this.
 
There are only two problems with your post; 1) people who want PP gone will never admit that he has improved recruiting, /quote]

I have no problem admittting that he might have improved recruiting. The concern after the last two years is his ability to translate that to wins on the field.
 
Carl great points. Although it is debatable to what point recruiting has improved or not the man must be given credit just for keeping it on the same level and not having it drop to the bottom. This conference has been decimated like the black knight in the holy grail. We are turning in very strong recruiting classes despite this.

How do we know he has improved recruiting? Virtually none of his recruits have seen the field.

I will say that getting Chandler in was a huge get.
 
Clueless. So many UCONN fans are just so clueless about our own football program.

Let's all just be excited for football games at Renstchler field. Can we do that? Let's focus on that. Ambrose is bringing his program to the field to open the season. Then Edsall is bringing his. Then we get Michigan. All in September before we get our last run at yet ANOTHER Big East title and a BCS game.

How are the rest of you not climbing the walls? Does anyone really think that these players and coaches aren't working their asses off in preparing for this season? How about we show them support?

I'm so psyched for football season, I don't know how I'm going to make it through the summer. I'm sure getting out on the ocean will help, and probably staying away from this website too.
 
.-.
Yes, these are all opinions. I've heard a lot about how stars and RR's don't matter. And yet somehow the teams with a lot of higher star rankings seem to be in the top25 every year.

At the very least, the people here can admit to Carl that third-party recruiting opinions are supporting Carl's opinion of Pasqualoni's recruiting upgrade, right? But I doubt we'll even see that... :rolleyes:

Yes, the attacks on PP go beyond rational criticism to angry hysteria. His recruiting has been solid, given the situation he landed in. Great? No. Looking at the players leaving for the NFL suggests to me that he knows how to coach a team in practice and that players improve under him. By the way, I think this was Calhoun's strength as well and I never felt he was more than just "good" as a game coach.

Everyone screams about the poor in game performances, especially last year. But as Belichick always says, the coaches don't run the ball, throw the ball, catch the ball, tackle or block. At some point it is on them. Looking back on the season I see a team with a very good defense. So good that if they can run the ball, control it, and score even a little, and not turn it over, they win. So GDL crashes an undersized RB into the line, and when we can't run, Whitmer airs it out, and the turnovers fall like rain. Was the strategy great? No, but I do think our personnel on offense last year were a horrible match to our strong D. We needed an accurate short passer, and bruising ball carrier to complement that D. We had an inaccurate QB, who turned it over way too much and forced the ball, and a small RB that couldn't make yards after contact. The inability of the coaches to adapt to that personnel, and find a way to run a ball control offense despite them, was their biggest failure.

In 2013 I don't think you will see a wide open passing offense. I expect the passing offense to use quicker reads and shorter routes, a more a West Coast style offense. More screens and passing to the backs. Cutting down the turnovers has to be a huge priority.
 
Yes, the attacks on PP go beyond rational criticism to angry hysteria. His recruiting has been solid, given the situation he landed in. Great? No. Looking at the players leaving for the NFL suggests to me that he knows how to coach a team in practice and that players improve under him. By the way, I think this was Calhoun's strength as well and I never felt he was more than just "good" as a game coach.

Everyone screams about the poor in game performances, especially last year. But as Belichick always says, the coaches don't run the ball, throw the ball, catch the ball, tackle or block. At some point it is on them. Looking back on the season I see a team with a very good defense. So good that if they can run the ball, control it, and score even a little, and not turn it over, they win. So GDL crashes an undersized RB into the line, and when we can't run, Whitmer airs it out, and the turnovers fall like rain. Was the strategy great? No, but I do think our personnel on offense last year were a horrible match to our strong D. We needed an accurate short passer, and bruising ball carrier to complement that D. We had an inaccurate QB, who turned it over way too much and forced the ball, and a small RB that couldn't make yards after contact. The inability of the coaches to adapt to that personnel, and find a way to run a ball control offense despite them, was their biggest failure.

In 2013 I don't think you will see a wide open passing offense. I expect the passing offense to use quicker reads and shorter routes, a more a West Coast style offense. More screens and passing to the backs. Cutting down the turnovers has to be a huge priority.

Their biggest failure and the inability you cite was that they could only see a ball control offense. That's not how college football is played these days. Unless you have the best players (position for position) the old 1950's running game won't get it done. Passing is the great equalizer today. Get a hot QB a couple of slippery WRs and you can compete with the best. Plus it's exciting football. UConn not only had an inept offense (a liability to the defensive efforts) but it was boring. No wonder the lack of enthusiasm for this program over the past two years.
 
Get a hot QB a couple of slippery WRs and you can compete with the best.
I'm in the camp that it was both the lack of talent and some poor coaching that killed us the last two years. But you can't possibly say this line with a straight face not realizing that our QBs and WRs were neither hot, nor slippery? Plus we had a line like a sieve?
 
Their biggest failure and the inability you cite was that they could only see a ball control offense. That's not how college football is played these days. Unless you have the best players (position for position) the old 1950's running game won't get it done. Passing is the great equalizer today. Get a hot QB a couple of slippery WRs and you can compete with the best. Plus it's exciting football. UConn not only had an inept offense (a liability to the defensive efforts) but it was boring. No wonder the lack of enthusiasm for this program over the past two years.

Interceptions were the single biggest reason we lost games last year. Throwing more, while a great idea in the abstract, was a bad idea both as implemented by our team/coaches and for that particular team. Controlled short passing attack might have worked, but with a line that couldn't pass block and a QB that forced the ball too often, interceptions killed us.
 
Picks were bad, but we lost far more games with too many 3 and outs and too many drives stalling around the 30 yd line.

Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,349
Messages
4,566,534
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom