junglehusky
Molotov Cocktail of Ugliness
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 7,157
- Reaction Score
- 15,475
For all of it's problems, the ACC is still going to be more stable than the NNBE. We all know the structural defects in the OBE/NBE - bball membership versus football members. Two things have changed - Notre Dame has left the scene, further isolating the bball / catholic schools, and Marinatto added new football members in big markets, plus a few football only schools. The NBE was a house of cards that was very fortunate to have one wing of the house collapse but have time to add new pieces to rebuild. But the structure of the NNBE is so precarious that removing either UConn or UL will result in the bball schools splitting off.
Now, if only UConn goes, perhaps we'll see the football membership stick together (UL, Cincy, USF, Navy, Boise, SDSU, UH, SMU, Temple might still be a step above the MWC). But you know both UConn and Louisville would much rather NOT be in that league. It would be felt as a much worse fit for UConn because of geographic, but more importantly, academic reasons. Though Temple, SMU and Navy are good academic institutions, there's just not enough in common with the student bases which as I've written about before, is a major consideration for UConn.
Now, if only UConn goes, perhaps we'll see the football membership stick together (UL, Cincy, USF, Navy, Boise, SDSU, UH, SMU, Temple might still be a step above the MWC). But you know both UConn and Louisville would much rather NOT be in that league. It would be felt as a much worse fit for UConn because of geographic, but more importantly, academic reasons. Though Temple, SMU and Navy are good academic institutions, there's just not enough in common with the student bases which as I've written about before, is a major consideration for UConn.