Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="prankster, post: 4766217, member: 14"] Of course, as so often around here, you are both correct and incorrect. At the heart of the battle, athletes were claiming an independent ownership right over their Names, Images and Likenesses. This is what the courts decided. They do have a superceding right to NIL. Thus enshrining that arcane terminology into common discourse. Still, it would be so much simpler to comprehend it to mean endorsements, however they may be derived. [/QUOTE]