01Neaggrad02 said:I still do not understand this. When I was in school the athletes had the meal plan included. We spent many a meals in South. Was there something about not being able to eat after a game? I just do not see how this was an issue....
Negotiating chit?? ("OK let's let them have unlimited food and loosen up on the street drugs, and maybe this unionization nonsense will go away."). #%?$&@##??!?In spite of the fun poking, actually it probably is an actual issue, perhaps less dramatic than kicker's story. Some college athletes do come from disadvantaged homes and are not getting much pocket money from parents. They can't get a job to earn the money, they can't accept the food as a gift . . .
And one can argue they don't need snacks, but that is kind of petty and nasty.
OTH, the article also indicated a decrease in penalties for street drugs in championships. Huh?
In spite of the fun poking, actually it probably is an actual issue, perhaps less dramatic than kicker's story. Some college athletes do come from disadvantaged homes and are not getting much pocket money from parents. They can't get a job to earn the money, they can't accept the food as a gift . . .
And one can argue they don't need snacks, but that is kind of petty and nasty.
OTH, the article also indicated a decrease in penalties for street drugs in championships. Huh?
I've been curious about that. They can't get part-time jobs to earn spending money if they play basketball etc? If they don't have affluent parents then they're SOL.
As much as the NCAA makes off them they couldn't give them extra consideration for meals?
Is this a serious suggestion?Couldn't a disadvantaged kid play basketball without a scholarship to avoid a lot of the NCAA insanity? If a kid is really good, take out loans with the hope that your future earnings will easily pay off the loans.
No, because it would affect his or her eligibility to play for the team. Team rules of eligibility are under the oversight of the NCAA.Couldn't a disadvantaged kid play basketball without a scholarship to avoid a lot of the NCAA insanity? If a kid is really good, take out loans with the hope that your future earnings will easily pay off the loans.
Couldn't they just be a walk on? Albeit a really good one. Tierney Lawlor does it, so why couldn't Shabazz Napier? Pretty much anyone can get student loans these days, so yes it is a serious suggestion.. If you're destined for the NBA the student loans would be repaid in no time with very little interest.No, because it would affect his or her eligibility to play for the team. Team rules of eligibility are under the oversight of the NCAA.
Walk ons are still overseen by the competitive rules of the NCAA.Couldn't they just be a walk on? Albeit a really good one. Tierney Lawlor does it, so why couldn't Shabazz Napier? Pretty much anyone can get student loans these days, so yes it is a serious suggestion.. If you're destined for the NBA the student loans would be repaid in no time with very little interest.
In Mens and women's basketball, it counts as a "scholarship" to the head count regardless, and indeed falls under NCAA scrutiny. A lot of these athletes may not qualify for other schollies or loan, and the NCAA has serious issues about loans granted for athletes. And the schollies may not pay living expenses as well.Couldn't they just be a walk on? Albeit a really good one. Tierney Lawlor does it, so why couldn't Shabazz Napier? Pretty much anyone can get student loans these days, so yes it is a serious suggestion.. If you're destined for the NBA the student loans would be repaid in no time with very little interest.
I still do not understand this. When I was in school the athletes had the meal plan included. We spent many a meals in South. Was there something about not being able to eat after a game? I just do not see how this was an issue....