You clearly didn't get the point. So I won't bother addressing your comments
Well, a miss for Liv might look like a pass to Edwards or Griffin inside. Ha Ha. She does hit one once in a while, might as well be a 3 from that distance or have her switch with Edwards and she takes a 3. Even our new freshman at 6'2" could fill this roll or a pick for slashing guards. The low early game percentages from this area of the court need to have some offensive rebound possibilities which we often don't even attempt. We also need to have the mechanics reviewed for Liv and Williams. Something isn't right. Golfers are constantly going over mechanics with swing coaches.
Space eater.
SC Thread this week is twice as long. So NO not even close.
Marquette post-game thread bigger. Course you keep packing this one. Not incredible.
I say this in fun-- is that you Muffitt?)? So, maybe you need to walk in their shoes of both player and coach to understand. Please don't take this post the wrong way. You're belief of "what's right and wrong what's ok" apparently is not the player or coaches beliefs of "what's right and wrong ok what's ok."
My reply is simple.You initially asked a question albeit a bit rhetorical as to how what he did builds up the player. Isn't it his job to win - and a byproduct is to build player's confidence up? His job is one of which coaches get fired for not winning more than anything else imo.
Some BYers will complain about other teams/coaches no matter what so they are the standard to which to judge?
It's not like the team has went off on him like some other coaches. You as a fan are complaining but how many players have complained about Geno? You said you weren't sure how this helps build up a player, correct?
Please I mean no offense no offense I fear you are going to take this wrong -- please don't. But where is the complaining other than you and a few handful of fans? If you were questioning Geno's methods because you think he is humiliating them in such a manner that's offensive- which players have come out and supported your opinion?
He wins with his style and players don't complain about it. If players don't complain about it- matter of fact players seem to welcome it - because they flock to UCONN - then maybe it's not near as bad as you think? My point is your right and wrong is not the same as others in all cases but you aren't in this same environment they live in, are you (who knows? maybe you are
Anyhow If you want to reply- go for it. I've said my peace.
Not if you put all the blowhards on ignore
Yep, 100% agree. Just did
Liv's outside shot is better than CW's or haven't you noticed? Liv also brings a lot more to the table such as rebounds, blocked shots, assists, intimidation and ball-movement, or haven't you noticed? Liv and CW have eggzackly the same FT%, [60%], so would you tell our so-called 'shooting guard' to NOT take a wide-open jumper from the foul line area? I think not.
You can have all the opinions you want, what you don’t have evidently is much reading comprehension. I never said she shouldn’t shoot, I said your assertion that she is a good shooter from the high post because of her FG% from layups primarily against players 3-5 inches shorter than her is absurd. I also said she has skills but no position. Address that if you are capable, but I have my doubts.
I agree that Liv is the #2 most important player on the team. Depending on the game though she may be anywhere between the #1 to #6 best player on the team. That inconsistency can be a headscratcher for me.
Yeah i m capable and I can read; I can show you my MENSA card if you have doubts. What are your credentials?
