That is a crazy argument. If we get an NCAA ban next year, it could be a temporary problem, and it could take a couple of years to recover, for sure, but 1) in the current NCAA basketball world, you can turn around on a dime with one guy. Land one or two big time recruits and you're there. heck UCONN did it from 2010 to 2011 just by getting a guy who was already there to improve and landing a couple of key role players. It isn't like you need to recruit for 4 years to rebuild. (2) Indiana is a silly example. Bobby Knight had not turned out really good teams for almost a decade. hadn't gotten out of the 2nd round in 7 years, hadn't won the Big 10 in 8 years. They had been a very ordinary high major, sort of the Big 10 version of the current Cincinatti maybe, for a very long time by the time he left Bloomington. (3) On the point of replacing Calhoun with Ollie, or risking alienating Calhoun and the fans, that is simply ridiculous. If the new coach wins, gets the team to the NCAA tournament and makes deep runs, he'll be fine with the fans and Calhoun has more sense than to complain. And if Ollie takes over and is a disaster, and given his lack of experience that is a rela possiblity, and Calhoun is seen as "forcing" that choice, he'll look bad,not good. And a new AD isn't going to surrender one of the defining decisions of his tenure to the outgoing basketball coach to whom he has zero ties. If he did that, he ought not have gotten the job in the first place. Just keep ol' Paul Prendergast in the fron office. 4) It isn't like UCONN knows how to put a winning product on the field or the court in any sports. If they had done it in some other sport, you know, been competetive in something like Womens basketball, baseball, soccer, womens soccer, field hockey, track & field, or football, won other national championships, we might have a chance ot survive the loss of Jim Calhoun. But since we haven't been any good at other sports...oh wait...this was a piece of trash.