UConnSwag11
Storrs, CT The Mecca
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,381
- Reaction Score
- 57,337
It’s time for Marquette to make a run. When was the last time Shaka did something in the tourney? Need them to make at least the elite 8
Who'd they pick?None of the 3-Man Weave guys, the most knowledgeable pundits, picked us.
Oh believe me, I think very highly of our team, but you must not be familiar with March Madness if you think playing a Final Four team that returned almost all of their players this year is going to be some cakewalk. I would rather us have to play quite a few teams that were better seeded than have to play FAU in the 2nd round.Then you don’t think much of our team….if you think we should feel some sort of way about Florida Atlantic University.

That's IF they get to us!I was looking at the Auburn and Iowa State forums. They are both terrified and irrate that they are in the East with UCONN![]()
SDSU over AuburnI was looking at the Auburn and Iowa State forums. They are both terrified and irrate that they are in the East with UCONN![]()
RIght. We have a 2-game tournament to win in Brooklyn. Let's beat Stetson and FAU/Northwestern. That feels like a great draw to the Sweet 16.That's IF they get to us!
Let's focus and win this thing!
So if given the choice between two essentially equidistant options, why would committee put the #15 overall seed with the #1, instead of #16?They don't get to actually pick. When I say "pick", the committee is essentially trying to place the geography for closest for the top 4 seeds.
I am not worried at all!
Because the #15 seed is assigned to the closest geographic region first, the EastSo if given the choice between two essentially equidistant options, why would committee put the #15 overall seed with the #1, instead of #16?
I wouldn't call 1,000 extra miles "essentially equidistant", but even if it were only 200 miles, that's just the rules they use.So if given the choice between two essentially equidistant options, why would committee put the #15 overall seed with the #1, instead of #16?
This is the most succinct explanation of his nonsense response to that question.That’s the way it came across from McClelland - instead of explaining how they focused on making the regions well balanced, he effectively said Uconn had their choice of regions (of course knowing they wanted to stay east) & opted for the region the committee already set up as the toughest.
A ridiculous response. Serious incompetence!
Sorry I meant the difference between Bama vs Auburn to either site.I wouldn't call 1,000 extra miles "essentially equidistant", but even if it were only 200 miles, that's just the rules they use.
The long answer is because St. John's didn't win the NEC. You don't want to hear the short answer.How does Wagner get a play-in but St John's doesn't? Wagner's 16-15 record is god awful - they lost games to Stonehill, CCSU, and the like.
because wagner won their conference?How does Wagner get a play-in but St John's doesn't? Wagner's 16-15 record is god awful - they lost games to Stonehill, CCSU, and the like.
They should be. Two teams that gamed the metrics (Auburn played 5 neutral OOC games vs non-NCAA tournament teams, Iowa State played maybe the weakest OOC ever for a top-8 seed) and we are shaking in our boots. Iowa State came into the year 31 in kenpom until they kicked the crap out of a bunch of bum schools OOC and hung around in the 10-15 range all year. They took a major jump to 5 this week because they kicked the crap out of a depleted Houston team playing their third game in 3 days. Both teams are weak defensive rebounding, foul a decent amount, and can't hit 3s. We could not have gotten a better draw at 2 and 4. I'm thanking our lucky stars for our draw and half of the Boneyard is about to be admitted to the looney bin. Matchups over metrics.I was looking at the Auburn and Iowa State forums. They are both terrified and irrate that they are in the East with UCONN![]()
The sad thing is that we would have been East even if we didn't get to pick. So we got the same bracket we would have gotten if we were the 3 instead of the 1.That’s the way it came across from McClelland - instead of explaining how they focused on making the regions well balanced, he effectively said Uconn had their choice of regions (of course knowing they wanted to stay east) & opted for the region the committee already set up as the toughest.
A ridiculous response. Serious incompetence!
I'm sure there's some kind of reason for this post but I'm having a hard time understanding what it is.How does Wagner get a play-in but St John's doesn't? Wagner's 16-15 record is god awful - they lost games to Stonehill, CCSU, and the like.
