Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="auror, post: 4560243, member: 1329"] Well maybe our win at Nova will get some extra consideration lol (and also there's good chance it becomes quad 1 by Sunday). I like Seth Burn a lot. He's the pioneer of WAB, which I think is the best resume metric. But from what I can tell this is a 1 year sample size with a clickbaity tagline (the fully explained stat is "47% of Q1 games are easier than one outlier Q2 game"). He's trying to get mainstream adoption of WAB and trying to go viral on this to spread some awareness. In which case, the problem isn't the quad system, but that the NET fails to properly value some outlier teams, especially ones with multiple sustained injuries. If anything, I'd say the graphic validates the quadrants. There are some very clear outliers, but otherwise, In a one year sample, 90% of the blue is more difficult than 90% of the red. [/QUOTE]