Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Sedona to Oregon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="CamrnCrz1974, post: 3212296, member: 1052"] [USER=7511]@oldude[/USER] , please allow me to respond -- and apologies to you and the entire Boneyard for the length of my post. First, if Sedona Prince were to bring a claim against the University of Texas, Prince bears the burden of proof (with respect to any medical malpractice or other claim), not the university. The university has the burden of production to rebut the evidence presented by Prince, but Prince, as the plaintiff/claimant retains the ultimate burden of proof. With that being said, why would the University admit fault, when there has been a vague statement about transferring for "medical reasons" without indicating anything was incorrect or improper or even to what Prince was referring in using that phrase? Second, even if it wanted to, the University could not respond right now (absent litigation, in which case the response(s) would be part of the legal proceedings), as a result of various rules that apply to college students and medical records (specifically, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)). [I]By way of background:[/I] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]--- FERPA is the federal law that protects the privacy of students’ “education records.” ([URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1232g']20 U.S.C. § 1232g[/URL]; [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/part-99']34 CFR Part 99[/URL]). [/INDENT] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]--- FERPA applies to educational agencies and institutions that receive funds under any program administered by the U.S. Department of Education. The term “education records” is broadly defined to mean those records that are: (1) directly related to a student, and (2) maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a party acting for the agency or institution. ([URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/99.3']34 CFR § 99.3[/URL]).[/INDENT] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]--- Medical and psychological treatment records of eligible students are excluded from the definition of “education records” if they are made, maintained, and used [U][I]only[/I][/U] in connection with treatment of the student and disclosed only to individuals providing the treatment. ([URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/99.3']34 CFR § 99.3[/URL]). [/INDENT] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]--- These records are commonly called “treatment records.” An eligible student’s treatment records may be disclosed for purposes other than the student’s treatment, provided the records are disclosed under one of the exceptions to written consent ([URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/99.31']34 CFR § 99.31(a)[/URL]) or with the student’s written consent. ([URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/99.30']34 CFR § 99.30[/URL]).[/INDENT] [I]What about the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), you may ask?[/I] [INDENT=2]--- The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires covered entities to protect individuals’ health records and other identifiable health information by requiring appropriate safeguards to protect privacy, and setting limits and conditions on the uses and disclosures that may be made of such information without patient authorization. [/INDENT] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]--- The rule also gives patients rights over their health information, including rights to examine and obtain a copy of their health records, and to request corrections. ([URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/part-160']45 C.F.R. Part 160[/URL]; [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/part-164/subpart-A']45 C.F.R. Part 164, Subpart A[/URL]; [URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/part-164/subpart-E']45 C.F.R. Part 164, Subpart E[/URL]).[/INDENT] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [I]What about the interplay between FERPA and HIPAA?[/I] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]---FERPA applies to most public and private colleges and universities and, thus, to the records on students at the campus health clinics of such institutions. [/INDENT] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]---These records will be either education records or treatment records under FERPA, both of which are excluded from coverage under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, even if the school is a HIPAA covered entity. ([URL='https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/160.103']45 CFR § 160.103 -- definition of "protected health information" and exceptions listed in ¶¶ (2)(i)-(ii)[/URL]).[/INDENT] [INDENT=2][/INDENT] [INDENT=2]---The HIPAA Privacy Rule specifically excludes from its coverage those records that are protected by FERPA.[/INDENT] [I] This is getting long and boring, [USER=1052]@CamrnCrz1974[/USER] -- can you bring this in for a landing?[/I] --- Sedona Prince's medical/treatment records are covered by FERPA. The University of Texas may not release any statement or document referencing any medical treatment at/by the University to anyone (other than for the purpose of treatment of Prince) absent Prince's consent. --- If Sedona Prince were to file a claim, the records would be released as part of litigation (though there would be a release and a subpoena, usually). --- There is no litigation here. No claim has been filed/submitted. There has been no suggestion that a claim/lawsuit is potentially going to be filed. The only thing that was stated was that a transfer was for "medical reasons" (which leads me to respond to the next quoted paragraph). In her statement, she did not allude or reference any agreement with Texas. See below: [MEDIA=twitter]1136275915904864256[/MEDIA] A transfer for "medical reasons" could be a number of things. Perhaps the University of Oregon has a medical staff/physicians that Prince prefers. Perhaps she did not like a physician, trainer, or physical therapist at Texas. Perhaps she made the statement to bolster any claim for an exception/waiver so she would not sit out 2019-20. We do not know. But what we do know is that there was discussion or reference to any "agreement" with the University of Texas regarding the transfer for medical reasons. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,422
Messages
4,395,709
Members
10,209
Latest member
gemini*trvl
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Sedona to Oregon
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom