Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SimpleDawg, post: 3301710, member: 9267"] Well, I think Henderson is speculation at best right now. Sure, a high recruit could freshman-sophomore leap any time, but she didn't stand out last year against MSU to me. (Though not a lot of minutes for sure) Not that I'm counting her out, but just you don't hear MSU fans bank on Myah Taylor for the same reason. I don't think Danberry will necessarily be "better," but I think she'll have roughly the same production as last year. And I think it's also because I think she'll get more touches. Last year McCowan and Howard took it upon themselves to make plays often. Danberry..... did too and she was only 3rd option. Jackson is the only other player on our roster that I think will take it upon herself to create offense which is why Danberry has an even better chance of being better - not that she will be better just stating one reason is because of possibly more touches. I also think Tysha Harris despite averaging more minutes than Danberry on a team without an alpha and average less points makes me think Danberry will have a better year than Harris next year. Even though Harris is definitely an assists machine. I agree Harrigan can definitely be first team all-SEC, but yes I agree with bballnut that Dungee and Carter seem to average great numbers even with an incessant amount of minutes and shots. We'll see what happens when Harrigan gets 30 minutes per game, as I think that's what we need her to have in order to see how good she truly is. I'm a huge fan of Harrigan, btw and yes I see those blocked shots stats which are very good - but she doesn't take many 3s either. Only 20 more attempts than Danberry. .. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,443

Messages: 4,396,443

Members: 10,209

Latest member: gemini*trvl