OT: - Seaton Hall | The Boneyard

OT: Seaton Hall

Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,349
Reaction Score
3,877
They did travel right before that so it wasn't entirely on the ref. Joe D just tweeted it was one of the guys from the UConn/Cincy game last week. That guy needs a performance review.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
550
Reaction Score
1,034
Screwed by call at the end of the game!

In the last minute of the game... a bogus blocking foul that sent Arkansas to the line, a traveling call on Seton Hall (which was a legitimate travel, but not usually called in the last minute of a march madness game), and then the awful intentional foul call. That was a travesty. C-Webb was sick about it.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
550
Reaction Score
1,034
They did travel right before that so it wasn't entirely on the ref. Joe D just tweeted it was one of the guys from the UConn/Cincy game last week. That guy needs a performance review.

Wow seriously? That explains it...
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,405
Reaction Score
18,910
Seton Hall and Providence made the dance and we didn't.

How is that possible?

They must have better recruiting classes than us. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,546
Reaction Score
11,047
Travel was legit; no question about that and it needs to be called. The intentional foul was debatable. Yes, the Ark kid sold it quite a bit. But what is the Seton Hall kid thinking by committing that foul. He literally had two hands on the back and pushed him. Whether you thought the call was appropriate or not based on context or not, it is so obviously stated in the rules that any foul that does not make a play on the ball is intentional/flagrant. It sucks but I do not think it was a bad call. If that was against us, we would have no issue whatsoever with it.

The bigger issue is that Seton Hall is just a dumb team. So many stupid turnovers, not getting back on defense; they lost that game. They were the much better team.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
8,310
Reaction Score
27,158
Travel was legit; no question about that and it needs to be called. The intentional foul was debatable. Yes, the Ark kid sold it quite a bit. But what is the Seton Hall kid thinking by committing that foul. He literally had two hands on the back and pushed him. Whether you thought the call was appropriate or not based on context or not, it is so obviously stated in the rules that any foul that does not make a play on the ball is intentional/flagrant. It sucks but I do not think it was a bad call. If that was against us, we would have no issue whatsoever with it.

The bigger issue is that Seton Hall is just a dumb team. So many stupid turnovers, not getting back on defense; they lost that game. They were the much better team.
The replay showed he barely pushed him, the kid fell because they're feet got tangled. Bad call, refs made it about them at the end in making that call.
 

formerlurker

www.stjude.org
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
5,686
Reaction Score
27,755
Who is Seaton Hall?

bcK_aby-ZRtl.jpg


The new Tappan Zee already has problems.
 

Online statistics

Members online
296
Guests online
2,871
Total visitors
3,167

Forum statistics

Threads
157,463
Messages
4,102,931
Members
9,994
Latest member
Newbie32


Top Bottom