SC vs LSU | Page 8 | The Boneyard

SC vs LSU

Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
2,015
Reaction Score
6,066
Realistically neither Fudd or Ducharme will be in good enough condition to start and play more than 15-20 minutes assuming they even get back before the NCAA’s. Assuming that’s correct Fudd would take minutes from both Senechal and Muhl and Ducharme probably Griffin. My opinion anyway. Without knowing what’s really going on with Fudd’s knee and Ducharme’s concussion situation I’m not sure either should play again this year. Obviously a question for the coaching and medical staff but Fudd’s initial diagnosis I believe was 3-6 weeks but it’s now 10+ and I’ve never heard of a player being in concussion protocol as long as Ducharme has been, so both situations are worrisome for this year.
Fudd reinjured her knee, she hasn't been out 10 weeks straight. Both will have been in rehab and conditioning for weeks before they start playing again. Azzi was back in game shape in mid-January- while she will have to build up her stamina again, Caroline has been practicing with limited contact for weeks now, meaning she is probably pretty close to game shape since her injury isn't leg based.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2022
Messages
83
Reaction Score
332
When SC played Stanford in early November, Cardoso only played 9! very ineffective minutes. She sat the entirety of the next game followed by what’s now been revealed to have been a Dawn Staley stern coach talk of “it’s time to get serious & realize your potential” - to which she has responded to greatly. In addition, though she played more minutes, Raven J. was still sporting a brace, in her 5th college game back from injury, & not playing with the same panache & confidence she is currently. Curious to see the impact both would bring now if a rematch w/ Stanford occurred in the tourney as both were very instrumental in the UConn road victory
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
2,015
Reaction Score
6,066
When SC played Stanford in early November, Cardoso only played 9! very ineffective minutes. She sat the entirety of the next game followed by what’s now been revealed to have been a Dawn Staley stern coach talk of “it’s time to get serious & realize your potential” - to which she has responded to greatly. In addition, though she played more minutes, Raven J. was still sporting a brace, in her 5th college game back from injury, & not playing with the same panache & confidence she is currently. Curious to see the impact both would bring now if a rematch w/ Stanford occurred in the tourney as both were very instrumental in the UConn road victory
You could say the same for Stanford though. Betts, Demetre, and Emma-Nnopu are all playing at much higher level than they were earlier in the year. Even Jump has improved her game significantly.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
133
Reaction Score
392
Did you watch the game? A close, physical game by the two best defenses in the country, where a call here or there may have changed the result. One of the most exciting games I’ve seen. Hoping for a rematch in the NC game.
I don't think UCONN would make it. I honestly think SC played the worse game they have played all season and still won. I think that is a scary thought. And although the score says 4 point difference that game was really in hand at the 2 min mark. As composed I think 10 teams have a shot to beat Uconn. I only see one team giving SC a shot and that is Stanford.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
133
Reaction Score
392
Next year UConn is gonna be tough, but this year, to me, isn't the year. I'm just be really realistic
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2017
Messages
1,295
Reaction Score
5,449
I don't think UCONN would make it. I honestly think SC played the worse game they have played all season and still won. I think that is a scary thought. And although the score says 4 point difference that game was really in hand at the 2 min mark. As composed I think 10 teams have a shot to beat Uconn. I only see one team giving SC a shot and that is Stanford.
One of the great things of this board is that posters are entitled to their opinion even why it is wrong :rolleyes:. I obviously disagree with you as I think even though UConn tired at the end they still showed they belonged in that game and could have won it with a couple breaks. Instead of dropping a dislike I'll just disagree.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2022
Messages
83
Reaction Score
332
You could say the same for Stanford though. Betts, Demetre, and Emma-Nnopu are all playing at much higher level than they were earlier in the year. Even Jump has improved her game significantly.
the only thing Betts’s game has in common right now with Cardoso is that they’re both 6’7 .

if they play again this season, it won’t be standing room only in Maples as well

…or Hartford
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
502
Reaction Score
1,215
Did you watch the game? A close, physical game by the two best defenses in the country, where a call here or there may have changed the result. One of the most exciting games I’ve seen. Hoping for a rematch in the NC game.
I'm hoping for a rematch in Greenville region finals, but I'd take the title game too. Means we don't have to play Stanford or LSU.
 
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
6,762
Reaction Score
20,145
the only thing Betts’s game has in common right now with Cardoso is that they’re both 6’7 .

if they play again this season, it won’t be standing room only in Maples as well

…or Hartford
The fact Betts hasn't gotten much playing time has short changed many from having a chance to see what she's capable of. There's a reason why she was a starter for USA's U19 squad in 2021 over several incoming freshman bigs, including DeBerry. Betts may be able to do more against Cardoso than some may assume.
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
502
Reaction Score
1,215
One of the great things of this board is that posters are entitled to their opinion even why it is wrong :rolleyes:. I obviously disagree with you as I think even though UConn tired at the end they still showed they belonged in that game and could have won it with a couple breaks. Instead of dropping a dislike I'll just disagree.
Hopefully Geno would keep his composure better, because if he didn't like the way that game was called inside, he sure isn't going to like the way it's officiated on a neutral court.

I don't think UConn is going to get a better shot at South Carolina in the postseason than you just had in the regular season. We did not play "horrible", but we did play a B game on the road while in lucky bounce/brick 3's, you got a half-dozen extra points in the 1st quarter alone.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
415
Reaction Score
881
I also think that SC is more than capable of repeating.

But I agree … if they have an off night and some team gets hot or even if another team keeps it close and gets a few lucky bounces, who knows. In the early rounds of the tourney last year I felt like SC was off their game at times and the only reason they didn’t lose was because their opponents just couldn’t hit the ocean from the shore.

However if SC plays like they did against UConn and LSU, they will be difficult to beat.
In the early rounds of the NCAA tourney last season S.C. was beating their opponents to a literal pulp. NC was the only team to give them a quasi test, including Uconn in the final tbh. The Uconn game was over after the first qtr.
 
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
1,165
Reaction Score
3,524
Bad news. To be honest SC played horrible against UCONN.
I don't think SC played horribly, although I think we have played better. What I do think though is that the UConn game really helped SC tighten up their defense playing against 2 talented bigs before we played LSU. There were some noticeable adjustments during the LSU game. That's why Dawn likes to play great teams. You don't really learn much playing horrible teams. I know some don't give Dawn a whole lot of credit for being a great in game coach, but I think she's really become one of the best.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
2,015
Reaction Score
6,066
Hopefully Geno would keep his composure better, because if he didn't like the way that game was called inside, he sure isn't going to like the way it's officiated on a neutral court.

I don't think UConn is going to get a better shot at South Carolina in the postseason than you just had in the regular season. We did not play "horrible", but we did play a B game on the road while in lucky bounce/brick 3's, you got a half-dozen extra points in the 1st quarter alone.
UConn didn't even have their best player or their 6th best player in the game. To think "lucky bounces" outweighs Fudd and CD returning is absurd.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
415
Reaction Score
881
the only thing Betts’s game has in common right now with Cardoso is that they’re both 6’7 .

if they play again this season, it won’t be standing room only in Maples as well

…or Hartford
Betts is effective at her height, and has some skills. But imo she is way less athletic than Cardoso. I’m not saying Betts is a stiff, not the case, but a big difference in agility and athleticism imho.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2023
Messages
415
Reaction Score
881
Well to be fair UConn only has 1 healthy 3 pt shooter right now, so it was not that hard to take that away. If Fudd was available or is available for NCAA tournament that would make a substantial difference. Whether Fudd can return is still a huge question but I’d love a rematch with a healthy Fudd and Ducharme.
If I’m not mistaken, SC has the #1 3 point shooting % defense in the nation. It does not matter who they play, this late in the season the stats don’t lie.
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
2,015
Reaction Score
6,066
If I’m not mistaken, SC has the #1 3 point shooting % defense in the nation. It does not matter who they play, this late in the season the stats don’t lie.
UConn also shooting less than 30% from three in February. Doesn’t matter who they play, this short handed the stats don’t lie.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
6,715
Reaction Score
40,547
Agree to disagree, Bone Dog.

I'd definitely pick SC, but I believe you don't do justice to the Stanford roster, either its starters or its bench. My point was simply that Stanford has athletes, and lots of very good ones. No one has as many as SC. That's not the issue, nor is that a guarantee the Gamecocks would win a rematch.
I don’t think we are disagreeing. I may not have expressed my initial reservation about Stanford clearly enough.
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2017
Messages
1,490
Reaction Score
9,521
In the early rounds of the NCAA tourney last season S.C. was beating their opponents to a literal pulp. NC was the only team to give them a quasi test, including Uconn in the final tbh. The Uconn game was over after the first qtr.
Man I swear I remember seeing one or two early tourney games where SC was just throwing up bricks in the first half. I remember thinking that I couldn’t see how they could beat Stanford playing like that. I even commented in the chat about it.
 
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
734
Reaction Score
4,270
College basketball is exciting because upsets do happen. Improbable does not equate to impossible. Top ranked teams do go down and when they lose, it is not necessarily because they played poorly. Sometimes opposing teams have remarkable performances. Individual players have exceptional days.

That said, you do have to put in the work to increase the odds of having spectacular days. Many teams are working hard to have their chance in the bright lights and some of them may well prevail.

Those of you with foregone conclusions are awaiting the humdrum of the inevitable. Others are preparing to concoct the stuff of legend. Here’s to an exciting rest of the season!
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
6,028
Reaction Score
21,210
College basketball is exciting because upsets do happen. Improbable does not equate to impossible. Top ranked teams do go down and when they lose, it is not necessarily because they played poorly. Sometimes opposing teams have remarkable performances. Individual players have exceptional days.

That said, you do have to put in the work to increase the odds of having spectacular days. Many teams are working hard to have their chance in the bright lights and some of them may well prevail.

Those of you with foregone conclusions are awaiting the humdrum of the inevitable. Others are preparing to concoct the stuff of legend. Here’s to an exciting rest of the season!
Well done mate. Well done
 

Carnac

That venerable sage from the west
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
15,930
Reaction Score
78,998
Not today.

18-2 open. We "learned"

SC defense is the best in the country

Cardoso is really good on both ends

Kim spent much of the second half on the court, why no warning or T?

Morris can deliver

With this talent and effort no one is going to touch SC throughout the tournament.
That's my take too, but some folks don't believe me. I'm not selling out, I'm just a realist calling it as I see it. There was a time when other schools DID NOT want to be in UConn's bracket for the tournament because they knew there was no way they could make it out of the regional bracket to the final four. Now it's South Carolina's bracket they don't want to be in. IMHO, this championship is South Carolina's to lose. They're BIG, deep, experienced, and very confident. Next year (when we have ALL of our players back healthy), it will be our turn once again to be the elephant in the room. ;)
 
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
313
Reaction Score
1,348
Cardoso has been better offensively, but she still is somewhat of a liability on defense. I think Brink would still be able to out-maneuver her like she did in the first game. We just saw Aaliyah Edwards do this to her in UConn's game with South Carolina. Even against LSU, their freshman was able to go around her a few times. I still think the length of Stanford can contend with South Carolina's, this has been the case regularly.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
6,028
Reaction Score
21,210
Cardoso has been better offensively, but she still is somewhat of a liability on defense. I think Brink would still be able to out-maneuver her like she did in the first game. We just saw Aaliyah Edwards do this to her in UConn's game with South Carolina. Even against LSU, their freshman was able to go around her a few times. I still think the length of Stanford can contend with South Carolina's, this has been the case regularly.
Can contend with? Unquestionably. I don't think any reasonable person can dispute that.

As to Cardosa being a "liability on defense" you are waaaaaaaaaaayy underestimating her. She has 1.9 blocks per game off the bench. Even though playing only 17.4 minutes per game, that 1.9 blocks per game is 32nd in the Nation. Yeah, Brink is better but not as much as you probably believe.

Brink........................ 23.6 minutes/pg, 3.4 blocks per game. = . 0.144 blocks per minute played
Cardosa.................. 17.4 minutes/pg, 1.9 blocks per game. = 0.131 blocks per minute played
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
36
Guests online
1,990
Total visitors
2,026

Forum statistics

Threads
160,158
Messages
4,219,240
Members
10,082
Latest member
Basingstoke


.
Top Bottom