- Joined
- Feb 3, 2020
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction Score
- 142
Dear lordCouldn’t agree more, Boston was also pushing out with her elbow and forearm trying to make space while dribbling with the other. Beal also had some offensive fouls that weren’t called.
Dear lordCouldn’t agree more, Boston was also pushing out with her elbow and forearm trying to make space while dribbling with the other. Beal also had some offensive fouls that weren’t called.
You just described Svetlana Abrosimova when she first started playing for Geno.Dorka did have some timely turnovers. And from an eye test, she looks uncoordinated and clumsy on the floor. She uses her body well but her inability to hold on to the ball or have court awareness it often times a problem. There was a pass from paige that went right through her hands (for an easy 2). I'm not saying AE was better or we have someone that we should replace Dorka with, it's just what I've seen from Dorka THUS FAR against better teams has been underwhelming
Yes later in the game she seemed awkward. The pass was as Paige stumbled part of the sequence Paige was run over, complained to the ref, SC scored off the missed shot, Lazy pass from Paige stolen by SC they scored, then the Dorka pass stolen SC scored again.Stats don’t always tell the complete story, but here’s a few to consider. +/- (Aaliyah-26, Liv -16, Dorka +8). So yes, by that team metric, UConn did better with Dorka on the court, although it should be pointed out that Dorka played only 16 minutes to Liv’s 34 and Aaliyah’s 21.
When we look at individual stats, Liv exceeds both Dorka & Aaliyah. But if we just compare Dorka and Aaliyah’s numbers, rebounds were equal at 3 apiece, Aaliyah outscored Dorka 6 to 2, but the most telling stats imo are fouls & turnovers. Aaliyah had 1 each. In only 16 minutes Dorka committed 3 fouls while turning the ball over 5 times.
Several of Dorka’s turnovers were awkward, getting the ball stripped from her hands or throwing a wild inbound pass after a SC made basket. It is my sincere hope that those types of miscues will disappear as Dorka gets more comfortable in UConn’s system. It may simply be the case that Dorka is trying too hard and just needs to relax and play the game.
Dorka did have some timely turnovers. And from an eye test, she looks uncoordinated and clumsy on the floor. She uses her body well but her inability to hold on to the ball or have court awareness it often times a problem. There was a pass from paige that went right through her hands (for an easy 2). I'm not saying AE was better or we have someone that we should replace Dorka with, it's just what I've seen from Dorka THUS FAR against better teams has been underwhelming
Hey, you are absolutely right. I was over the top snarky there and I sincerely apologize. Please don’t let my thoughtless response influence you away from something you enjoy. I will try to reread my posts before I press that blue button. Again, I’m sorry.You and someone else objected to what I wrote, which is fine. And I see some people liked your post. We have different ideas.
No, I don’t want him to sob apologetically or resign. I wrote nothing about panic. As I said, I admire Geno. I don’t understand your sarcasm.
In the presser I hear him talking about the problems with the players, but I don’t hear him discussing his own errors with the game plan or the decisions he made during the game. Maybe I missed something.
I joined the BY recently because I’m from a foreign country, and I spend a lot of time following the team. Not just the games but the articles, videos, etc. I thought it would be great to interact with other people who have the same interest. An obscure interest where I live. Not that I’m interested only in UConn basketball. I follow the EuroLeague and the NBA.
Anyway, I love reading everyone's comments. But there are a lot of snarky comments on this board, and I’m not sure if this is what I want to spend my time on.
Great post.2nd qtr - we missed several ORB due to long rebounds. We had them boxed out, but the ball bounced far off the rim and we lost the rebound - it happens. unfortunately, I counted 5 long rebounds that went right to SC when we had them boxed out. we lost a couple ORB when we got tied up or couldn't get a grip on the ball.
We need more out of AE. I thought she would impose her will on the game this year and she has not. I do believe she will be a force by year end...along with . 's defense worries me however.
SC can run also. I realize you were not specifically speaking about speed, no team can transition faster than SC when Henderson is flying with the ball. I think you are discussing how fast UCONN can run their offense off of transitions.I really think that we were very run down and tired. It reminded me of how we have played at times in recent Final Four games especially last year. You are not going to match SC's size so you have to run which we did great at times. Here's the problem though- when they are getting a shocking 19 offensive rebounds you aren't running. When you are throwing the ball away you aren't running. When you are beat physically and clearly tired, you ain't running.
He needs Aubrey but Azzi has to learn that if she can't play college defense she won't be out there in big games. To me, Nika and AE look like it's their freshman year. I can't understand it because it is a skill relapse so to speak. What is it with Evina in the second half? Is it intentional? A conditioning thing? Her knee? She is a different player from half to half.
Again, we have to beat this team to win it all and to do so a lot of things have to change. Right now, this is a far better team than us when we can't take advantage of our strengths because of our lack of endurance. Give them a few days off. Let this sink in and really aggravate and annoy them. I will be at the Seton Hall game. It will probably be a crush. Aubrey should be back by then to play at her father's Alma Mater.
thank you. cuz that's exactly what happened. with each game, new players actually learn the on court tendencies of their new teammates, and reality is sooooo different from a video, especially the speed part. im fairly certain that dorka's education on that one went like ' wait, whut? that almost never happened before..., now, i know. cool.'That kinda reminded me of the Ben Simmons playoff deal. I wonder if Juhasz was expecting Bueckers to go to the basket as she was driving that way, and when Bueckers threw her (Juhasz) a high hard one at the last second, she was slow reacting because she wasn't expecting it, but rather was moving toward the basket to try to rebound any miss from Bueckers.....
Thank you, Cuango.Hey, you are absolutely right. I was over the top snarky there and I sincerely apologize. Please don’t let my thoughtless response influence you away from something you enjoy. I will try to reread my posts before I press that blue button. Again, I’m sorry.
Thank you for the kind reply Sly.Great post.
On the first comment above, I know there is not much to do on long rebounds, but shouldn't that responsibility of boxing out be on our guards?
I have been a huge fan of AE, and am befuddled by her start to the season. Was her confidence hurt during the Olympics?
That's all true but I wasn't talking about running our offense off of transition. We got our 11 point lead by several fast breaks with turnovers by SC and defensive rebounds. You can only run like that for so long. Despite Henderson, our advantage was in our guards with our speed.SC can run also. I realize you were not specifically speaking about speed, no team can transition faster than SC when Henderson is flying with the ball. I think you are discussing how fast UCONN can run their offense off of transitions.
SC came into the matchup having played more games than UCONN, and against better competition. They were probably better conditioned, and because of their more frequent use of their bench were also more rested. UCONN will get better conditioned as the season progresses, but if they stick to mostly a 7 player rotation they will also be more worn down by tourney time, as you mentioned has been evident in some recent final four matchups.
So Geno knows, he has to develop 1-2 more players to play prominent minutes by season end. Fudd will be his main focus, but there has to be others also. And prior to the next matchup with SC, an answer has to emerge for how to negate their huge advantage in rebounds and interior play in general.
I suspect Geno will play around with various defensive sets prior to that matchup as he looks to find answers. Right now, depending on 4 quarters of elite perimeter shooting to overcome those deficiencies looks shaky, as it puts too much of the load on PB and company.
UCONN will likely play more zone and try to stay big enough in the lineup to negate that rebounding disadvantage, but then you have to be really good at every position in perimeter defense to pull that off, and some of the better shooters on the team don’t fit that mold right now. Apparently Fudd’s defense is not ready or she would be playing more right now.
Great post. But do you really believe Henderson, Cook and Littleton are slower than PB, EW and CW? SC has the speed advantage If there is one.That's all true but I wasn't talking about running our offense off of transition. We got our 11 point lead by several fast breaks with turnovers by SC and defensive rebounds. You can only run like that for so long. Despite Henderson, our advantage was in our guards with our speed.
Our core 3 of scoring of Evina, Paige and CW played far too many minutes in the first two games. They needed to be rested and ready for that game and I don't think the number of prior games played by SC mattered. It was the two games before. SC has more playable depth and had a cakewalk for both prior games. Oregon's top 3 players were out.
I just don't see this pattern of playing so many minutes by our core 3 working again in the FF this year. We have not been at our sharpest and best physically the last 4 times when it mattered most. We looked tired and unsure and you can't win like that. John Wooden famously pointed out how conditioning matters most at the end of games. He was the first coach to practice at game speed. His teams always were perfectly conditioned. They did pretty well.
I remember Geno saying that Paige wins all the sprint battles at practice. At 1st I thought that was positive then I realized she doesn't seem like a fast player to me. So is the team slow in general?Great post. But do you really believe Henderson, Cook and Littleton are slower than PB, EW and CW? They have the speed advantage.
Yes, that's why their transition game sucks...I remember Geno saying that Paige wins all the sprint battles at practice. At 1st I thought that was positive then I realized she doesn't seem like a fast player to me. So is the team slow in general?
I don't think a 'slow' team can thrive on transition.I remember Geno saying that Paige wins all the sprint battles at practice. At 1st I thought that was positive then I realized she doesn't seem like a fast player to me. So is the team slow in general?
"Fast" does not mean good.Paige is fast. When they are not sidelined by injury, Aubrey is faster, and, I believe, Mir is the fastest. Recall that Mir was a track and field athlete.
My problem was with the Minnesota game. Playing two games with 30 plus minutes back to back is one thing; playing three games back to back with 30 minutes is impossible.Great post. But do you really believe Henderson, Cook and Littleton are slower than PB, EW and CW? SC has the speed advantage If there is one.
Reference the minutes in the recent tourney, how many more minutes could the guards have rested versus USF without possibly changing the outcome of that game?
Well then the problem wouldn’t be the new playersYou are correct. It was a smile of disbelief.
In his presser he said, in effect, that he was having trouble getting through to this group.
This is something he has said repeatedly for the last few years.
What can he do to solve this continuing problem?
Don’t worry about the snarky its just internet babble.You and someone else objected to what I wrote, which is fine. And I see some people liked your post. We have different ideas.
No, I don’t want him to sob apologetically or resign. I wrote nothing about panic. As I said, I admire Geno. I don’t understand your sarcasm.
In the presser I hear him talking about the problems with the players, but I don’t hear him discussing his own errors with the game plan or the decisions he made during the game. Maybe I missed something.
I joined the BY recently because I’m from a foreign country, and I spend a lot of time following the team. Not just the games but the articles, videos, etc. I thought it would be great to interact with other people who have the same interest. An obscure interest where I live. Not that I’m interested only in UConn basketball. I follow the EuroLeague and the NBA.
Anyway, I love reading everyone's comments. But there are a lot of snarky comments on this board, and I’m not sure if this is what I want to spend my time on.
Yeah, I posted earlier on this. By the FF your top 5 better not be exhausted.My problem was with the Minnesota game. Playing two games with 30 plus minutes back to back is one thing; playing three games back to back with 30 minutes is impossible.
I don't think it's just straight speed. If we are going to ever beat them it is going to have to come from our core 3. We are better than them there, trust me.
As I think about this more, I don't think Geno is really upset. He has a very clear picture now. If you watched the Gonzaga game you saw perfect boxing out by 5 players, not like us. We are terrible at it. It looks like an AAU team. Everybody on Gonzaga drives. We rarely do except for CW. There are ways to drive without encountering a center on defense. Evina and Paige have to do it more and Azzi has to do it and pull up. I also think Dorka should start. AE is better as a sub, that's just a fact. This is a FF team. NC team, not yet by a long ways. Geno is great at team development but not great at team preservation. We haven't been peaking physically or psychologically for the FF our last 4 times there.
Thank you, Martin. I learn a lot from the BY.Don’t worry about the snarky its just internet babble.