Sarah Strong - A Generational Talent | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Sarah Strong - A Generational Talent

As I stated in my OP, the term “generational talent” is overused. I also indicated a more subtle definition of the term to indicate “an athlete doing remarkable things at a level that we’ve never quite seen before.” On that basis, I stand by my OP that DT, Maya, Stewie, Paige & Sarah all qualify as generational talents.

If anyone disagrees then I would ask you to offer up your suggestions as to which specific WBB players are generational talents, from UConn or anywhere, without reverting to MJ, some other MBB player or someone from another sport. Then we can all have a spirited debate, kind of like the annual “all time UConn starting 5” debate that rolls around every offseason.
One thing that encourages me in the comparison to Diana is that like Sarah she also benefitted from having a NPoY and eventual #1 draft pick playing next to her in her freshman season.

It’s all lining up!!!!! OMG!
 
I believe that wait would've been no more than about 48 hours. Auriemma knew exactly what he had in Strong and that she was already better than both of those kids when she got to campus and had a couple of workouts.
Reminiscent of Paige who, prior to ger 1st game as a Husky, Geno pronounced that, “She’s even better than I thought.”
 
You'd be hard pressed to find such an accomplished freshman anywhere else in the country. Sarah is a unique talent that has the skill set of a guard, forward and center. I can't think of any other player in recent memory that has the same skill sets as Sarah.
 
As I stated in my OP, the term “generational talent” is overused. I also indicated a more subtle definition of the term to indicate “an athlete doing remarkable things at a level that we’ve never quite seen before.” On that basis, I stand by my OP that DT, Maya, Stewie, Paige & Sarah all qualify as generational talents.

If anyone disagrees then I would ask you to offer up your suggestions as to which specific WBB players are generational talents, from UConn or anywhere, without reverting to MJ, some other MBB player or someone from another sport. Then we can all have a spirited debate, kind of like the annual “all time UConn starting 5” debate that rolls around every offseason.
I agree. The term is not only overused but, imo, is pretty much meaningless. People that use it don't even have a consensus of how long a generation is. Some of them seem to think it's every couple years or so and that there's an infinite supply of them. And GOAT is even worse. They somehow believe there can be more than one greatest. Just Google 'does greatest of all time imply singular' and read what comes up. Sure, it can be broken down into categories like greatest shooter, greatest passer, greatest defender, etc. but there can be only one greatest womens or greatest mens player of all time. Of course, if they want to change their opinion every other year, then go for it. ;)
 
You'd be hard pressed to find such an accomplished freshman anywhere else in the country. Sarah is a unique talent that has the skill set of a guard, forward and center. I can't think of any other player in recent memory that has the same skill sets as Sarah.
Agree about Sarah's diverse skill set, which makes her the most difficult defensive assignment. But there were other freshmen who could have dazzled if they'd had a coach who handed them the keys to the team the way Geno did. I'm thinking of kids like Joyce Edwards or Avery Howell or Kayleigh Heckel. We can only speak in terms of potential with them since they didn't start at their teams, whereas Geno was smart enough to start Sarah and let her really shine. And there are kids like Mikayla Blakes or Olivia Olson or Syla Swords or Kennedy Smith who did start and actually did shine, though perhaps not quite as brightly as Sarah did.

This was an exceptionally talented class, and Sarah is at the top of it in my view. Her brilliance is not diminished by seeing how good her competition is.
 
I agree. The term is not only overused but, imo, is pretty much meaningless. People that use it don't even have a consensus of how long a generation is. Some of them seem to think it's every couple years or so and that there's an infinite supply of them. And GOAT is even worse. They somehow believe there can be more than one greatest. Just Google 'does greatest of all time imply singular' and read what comes up. Sure, it can be broken down into categories like greatest shooter, greatest passer, greatest defender, etc. but there can be only one greatest womens or greatest mens player of all time. Of course, if they want to change their opinion every other year, then go for it. ;)
Well GOAT is definitely overused. But "generational" could depend on context. In human procreation it's maybe 20 or 25 years. In context of a college career maybe it's 4 years. That would make generational synonymous with "best in class". At least that is the way I think of "generational".
 

Online statistics

Members online
35
Guests online
722
Total visitors
757

Forum statistics

Threads
164,012
Messages
4,378,568
Members
10,171
Latest member
ctfb19382


.
..
Top Bottom