- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 382
- Reaction Score
- 850
I don't think this article was posted yet. Jenkins nails Emmert, "High Guardian of the Pure Bastion".
Sally Jenkins article
Sally Jenkins article
good. If someone is gonna pay a kid for his talent and we're not he should go where he can make some money.It all sounds great until you realize the unbelievable recruiting advantage this will give schools there for top players.
I’m curious if you would say that if the State of RI passed this law?good. If someone is gonna pay a kid for his talent and we're not he should go where he can make some money.
Btw, I should add the NCAA needs to change. Players should be paid. But a single state is a problem.good. If someone is gonna pay a kid for his talent and we're not he should go where he can make some money.
I'm kind of torn on this. It is tough to say that the NCAA or a school can profit off a kid, but he cannot. And yet, I see a Pandora's box of issues. Are kid's going to be willing to come off the bench when starters make more money? Are they going to be willing to defend and set screens? Who will pay for that? I don't see this going anywhere good.
I found this article pretty much unreadable. "See how many clever phrases I can conjure up?" More words used for the sake of using them than to tell the facts or the story.Take anything Sally Jenkins publishes with a grain of salt.
yes. If anyone is paying college athletes the top players should go there.I’m curious if you would say that if the State of RI passed this law?
Okay so let's just keep giving the NBA a free farm league and let everyone profit off of it except the people actually putting butts in seats.Every single player has the option to go pro. Every single one.
If you want to play basketball for a living, go play basketball for a living.
Okay so let's just keep giving the NBA a free farm league and let everyone profit off of it except the people actually putting butts in seats.
Yeah and if a state decided to pay them they have the option to go there, too.If they don't like the deal, go pro.
It is an option for every single player.
Pretending that there is no value in their scholarship and housing is idiotic.
Can't wait for the social warriors to blurt out, "it's not fair for one kid to get so much. We need to put all the money in a pot and then divide it up among all student athletes based not on their ability to put fannies in the seats/sell t-shirts/win tournament games, but on the fact they are above ground and still able to fog a mirror ."
OK I’m pretty sure we’re not arguing about the same thing. I said I was in agreement to players should be paid but that needs to be done at the NCAA level and short of that right now I don’t think it’s fair for one state to enact this lawyes. If anyone is paying college athletes the top players should go there.
do we really think our fandom is more important than people's livelihood?
"Presumably, Emmert sent such a letter because the NCAA leadership is scared. A law such as this could very well be how it all ends, how the NCAA’s feudal castle is finally dismantled, rotting old beam by beam".I don't think this article was posted yet. Jenkins nails Emmert, "High Guardian of the Pure Bastion".
Sally Jenkins article
I think the NCAA making money off it's member schools is OK but should substantially be funded back in some fashion. What is the NCAA's net worth? How much of that do they really need for the purpose of their tax exemption status (501 (c) (3)? Same thing with the upper echelon universities which have ridiculous endowment money in stock that gives them clout on major corporations boards vs. the purpose of their existence (to provide education). They (NCAA) should never be making any money off an individuals name.If they don't like the deal, go pro.
It is an option for every single player.
Pretending that there is no value in their scholarship and housing is idiotic.