Saint Mary's Scouting Report | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Saint Mary's Scouting Report

ZenConn said:
Focus needs to be on rebounding. In their win vs the Zags, they out rebounded them. Houston, even in their win, got out rebounded. Same in their win against VCU.

Even with the lack of athletes as compared to some of their competition, it looks like almost everyone on the team has a nose for the ball. Its going to come down to our ability to team rebound. If we want to push the pace, we need to ensure we have the rebound instead of leaking early.
Expand ...
Bingo. We win the loose balls - we fly to the ball and want the ball - we win big. We lose the loose balls, the momentum swings the wrong way, it’s an uncomfortable last 4 minutes.
 
nice scouting report, Hey Adrien. I have watched a few St. Mary’s games this year. SMarys is very deliberate with their pace and they love to test the limits of opposing defenses attention and discipline by not only milking most of the shot clock but using a lot PnR action and constant screening in hopes the defense breaks down. One way that Gonzaga countered that in the WCC final was to throw a soft press, not hell bent on creating TOs, but simply to delay them from getting into their half court offense leaving them less than 20 seconds to run their offense.

mahaney is Tyler Kolek lite, but very much a diet version of him. UConn will have to be careful with hard hedge because Mahaney has good court vision. And ur data backs up what I observed too, and that is his defense is weak. If SMarys decides to put him on AJax, that should provide UConn with offensive rebounding opportunities. UConn doesn’t need to fear St Mary’s running a fast break on them if UConn goes after offensive rebounds.

Having Hawk guard Bowen might be good because Bowen just pretty much hides in the corner. I would put AJax on Logan Johnson.
 
I keep track of our possessions and we average about 35 possessions per half. This may not be exact but if we get 32 possessions it should it is being played to our tempo. Tempo and rebounding will be ultra important. Hopefully we can wear them out
 
OkaForPrez said:
Do we break out the 1-3-1 for this one?
Expand ...
No. The 1-3-1 is a zone defense that is weak in defensive rebounding and allows the opponent a greater chance to get offensive rebounds. St. Mary's will park Mitchell Saxon near the basket if UConn plays the 1-3-1 and he will feast on getting offensive rebounds while Sanogo will be out of position due to his zone assignment. Saxon really does not score beyond 6 feet from the basket (even that distance might be generous). He gets his baskets by overpowering and muscling his defender and he is very good at it. If he tries to do that against Sanogo when Sanogo has good defensive position, Saxon will fail most of the times if not all the time, he ain't overpowering Sanogo. Sanogo and Eric Dixon are immovable, if they get to their spot(s), no other player is going to move them off the spot.

Rebounding will be even more important in this game than usual. UConn can't run if they don't have the ball first from rebounding.
 
.-.
gsmooth said:
No. The 1-3-1 is a zone defense that is weak in defensive rebounding and allows the opponent a greater chance to get offensive rebounds. St. Mary's will park Mitchell Saxon near the basket if UConn plays the 1-3-1 and he will feast on getting offensive rebounds while Sanogo will be out of position due to his zone assignment. Saxon really does not score beyond 6 feet from the basket (even that distance might be generous). He gets his baskets by overpowering and muscling his defender and he is very good at it. If he tries to do that against Sanogo when Sanogo has good defensive position, Saxon will fail most of the times if not all the time, he ain't overpowering Sanogo. Sanogo and Eric Dixon are immovable, if they get to their spot(s), no other player is going to move them off the spot.

Rebounding will be even more important in this game than usual. UConn can't run if they don't have the ball first from rebounding.
Expand ...
Respect
 
OkaForPrez said:
Do we break out the 1-3-1 for this one?
Expand ...

We could. I think pressing with our athletes might be more effective though. Risky to zone an offensive rebounding team.

We need to speed them up. Press would be one strategy to do it. Would like to see aggressive hedging too. They don't have a great roll man.
 
Our press will be effective against this team. If we make them chew up 25-30% of the shot clock getting the ball over half court, their slothy offense gets sped up considerably out of necessity. If I'm Hurley, I smack them with the press at an opportune time and try to blow the game open.

Impressive write up, per usual, @Hey Adrien!
 
UCbcm said:
Our press will be effective against this team. If we make them chew up 25-30% of the shot clock getting the ball over half court, their slothy offense gets sped up considerably out of necessity. If I'm Hurley, I smack them with the press at an opportune time and try to blow the game open.

Impressive write up, per usual, @Hey Adrien!
Expand ...
More possessions = more potential fouls. They have a lighter bench.
 
UCbcm said:
Our press will be effective against this team. If we make them chew up 25-30% of the shot clock getting the ball over half court, their slothy offense gets sped up considerably out of necessity. If I'm Hurley, I smack them with the press at an opportune time and try to blow the game open.

Impressive write up, per usual, @Hey Adrien!
Expand ...
Exactly. Not a press hell bent on getting turnovers but one that prevents them from getting into their offense immediately.
 
.-.
Doomed-2.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,169
Messages
4,555,618
Members
10,441
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom