- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,748
- Reaction Score
- 428,267
Roster - what does this mean for current seniors
- Thread starter Exit 4
- Start date
SubbaBub
Your stupidity is ruining my country.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,570
- Reaction Score
- 26,567
I see about 3 kids on each list that based on past performance would be considered a plus contributor next year if extra eligibility would be granted. That's not to say the others couldn't make a big leap this year with or without a regular season. Point is, while it sucks for the players, I don't think this is a big an issue for the program going forward as some might assume.
If the NCAA does the right thing, some will be asked to stay, some of those will actually stay, and the rest will move on with their lives just like every other college grad.
As for recruiting, Randy should fill every spot he can fill based solely on talent and worry about grads later.
If the NCAA does the right thing, some will be asked to stay, some of those will actually stay, and the rest will move on with their lives just like every other college grad.
As for recruiting, Randy should fill every spot he can fill based solely on talent and worry about grads later.
Chin Diesel
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 35,288
- Reaction Score
- 118,742
Some G5 and independents may be able to take advantage of some of those "cuts".
I already said I'm okay with schools going above 85 schollies for next two seasons.
Only 85 are eligible to play football, rest keep their scholly to finish degree.
Alternately, player can transfer with no restrictions to another school and be immediately eligible to finish their playing eligibility.