The thought that Tyler Olander was a mid-major basketball player needs to be buried. He played damn near 2,000 minutes for a program that was the best in the country during his four years. He played seventeen minutes in the final four, 62 minutes in the NCAA Tournament, and went 9-1 in 10 career tournament games (he DNP'd vs. 'Nova, Iowa State, and Kentucky this year). No, he wasn't the primary or even secondary basis for that success, but the mere fact that a Hall of Fame head coach, and then later, perhaps a future Hall of Famer, trusted him to play crucial minutes on the largest possible stage is in itself a huge accomplishment.
It's interesting. As a fan base, we're boastful, even sometimes conceited when we're measuring our success against other programs. But yet when it's time to appraise the talent and ability of the players that are responsible for that success, that context occasionally gets neglected. I can promise you that everyone who gets a scholarship from this place is really f'in good at basketball, and those that play extensive, significant minutes are on the court for a reason.
Is Tyler Olander as good as Roscoe Smith? Obviously not. He's not as good as Alex Oriakhi, either. But for a good portion of the 2012 season, he was better than those two. During the first 15 games that year - roughly half the season - he averaged 7 points, 6 rebounds, 2 assists, and 1 block per game. In addition, his passing skills from the high post made him a better fit with Drummond, and he defended the perimeter better than Oriakhi. Tyler Olander played a role on a championship team as a freshman, worked hard over the summer, and earned the minutes he was given as a sophomore. He was recruited as a power forward and showed glimpses of excelling in a certain role before being pressed into duty as a center following the mass exodus of 2012. For some reason, this always gets discounted - the kid had his flaws and his work ethic is questionable, but he never did get the credit he deserved for playing the role of sacrificial lamb at center his final two years when he was always better suited as a four.
Roscoe Smith was a great Husky, but the player he would become at UNLV was not the guy he was as a sophomore at UConn. He averaged 4 points and 3 rebounds per game while shooting 42% from the field and 24% from three, and her per minute numbers for that season were actually a little worse than Olander's. On a team that was spacing-deprived all season, Smith was a complete zero offensively, and as a result, the things he did do well - defending, running the floor, grabbing tough rebounds - were mortgaged.
When Olander hit the wall in the middle of the year, Smith inherited those minutes and was back to playing like his old self by the end of the year. I don't blame him for transferring and will always hold him in a high regard. But spare me the revisionist history BS about how he got a raw deal here.