- Joined
- Feb 15, 2017
- Messages
- 661
- Reaction Score
- 4,277
I hear you, Mate. I certainly thought that at the time. Probably remains true. I suspect they gave the award to Jenkins because of some prejudice that disproportionately weighted wins and IP. Jenkins had 3 more starts (39 to 36); more IP (325 v. 286); and he pitched 30 (!) complete games (vs. Seaver's 21). Fergie also gave up fewer walks. But Seaver bested him in just about every other statistical category, comparatively and in absolute terms: fewer hits; fewer HRs allowed, more shutouts, more Ks, fewer HBP, fewer IBB, fewer losses, higher win %, etc. While not a factor in Cy Young voting, Seaver was also a better fielder (1 error over the entire season, v. 7 errors by Jenkins), though in fairness Jenkins had a better year at the plate, including 6 HRs (!).Seaver was 20-10 in 1971 with a 1.76 ERA and led the league in strikeouts. Jenkins was 24-13 with an ERA over a run higher. Even as a kid I knew that Seaver should have won the Cy Young that year.
Over Seaver's last 12 starts that season (early August to season's end) his ERA was a hair above 1.00.
Last edited:
I'm