storrsroars
Exiled in Pittsburgh
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2012
- Messages
- 23,008
- Reaction Score
- 55,673
Nah. You have no context and you won't see it coming,spoiler alert?
Nah. You have no context and you won't see it coming,spoiler alert?
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.Nah. You have no context and you won't see it coming,
You're a better man than I, only made it for about 20 minutes. Long stretches of nothing happening, no one was likable, boring, looked cheaply made."On The Line" (2022) - The second to last twist was a "Huh?" moment in a movie that had me thinking the movie was dumb up to that point, anyway. Then, the final twist was predictable.
Mel Gibson plays an overnight radio station host at KLAT. The staff plays a major prank on him. And that is the final twist.
However long the movie is that much sooner I am to death.
Fun fact: my sister’s high school boyfriend was an extra during the piano scene. Since a photo of him is in the background of the back of the dvd/vhs cover, he gets a nominal royalty check indefinitely.Big (1988) - Man, this Tom Hanks movies still has lol moments. I love this movie.
John Heard doing the mocking, "I don't get it! I don't get it!" ha ha
People still buy Big VHS tapes?Fun fact: my sister’s high school boyfriend was an extra during the piano scene. Since a photo of him is in the background of the back of the dvd/vhs cover, he gets a nominal royalty check indefinitely.
Big will always be a special movie to me.Fun fact: my sister’s high school boyfriend was an extra during the piano scene. Since a photo of him is in the background of the back of the dvd/vhs cover, he gets a nominal royalty check indefinitely.
Pretty much agree. It is a peek behind the curtain story. But you know there is not this much drama in real life. And if there was it would be more low key. I am saying that having worked with a couple of cardinals and bishops. I enjoyed it as well.Conclave. Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow. Set at the Vatican obviously. The pope has died. Fiennes is Cardinal Lawrence, the Dean of Cardinals whose job it is to manage the Conclave process to select a new pope. There are political factions within the Cardinals, and some surprises along the way. Fairly constant tension and it’s all really well filmed. I’m sure there’s quite a bit of creative license here but the process itself seems to be accurately portrayed. Won’t say more. Enjoyed it.
I tried this. Don't think I even made it 30 minutes. Whoever wrote the screenplay is a total hack. Just awful.She's the lead in a rom-com that just came out. I don't think we're the target audience.
![]()
'Sweethearts' Director Told Kiernan Shipka and Gen Z Cast to Flag Anything That Was Too 'Millennial Cringe'
First-time director Jordan Weiss and partner Dan Brier wanted to write a coming-of-age comedy based on their own male-female friendship.www.thewrap.com
Watched "Carry-On" (Netflix) yesterday. Let the "Christmas movie" debate begin - like Die Hard, it takes place in an airport on Christmas Eve, and the entire soundtrack is well-known Christmas songs. Taron Egerton is a low level TSA guy, Jason Bateman is a baddie trying to make sure a suspect bag passes thru security. It has its moments. But I think at the end, if you're like me, you're really going to wonder if that refrigerator was designed to keep any and all contents hermetically sealed inside.
Yeah, not great. Pretty good for the first half or 2/3, but the companion musical number to the first movie was an epic disaster. Overall arc of the movie reminded me of Argyle. Decent, then off the rails completelyJust watched Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice. I wanted to love it. I didn’t . Meh.
Probably would have been better set in a fictional country like the US where people weren't trying to figure out which side was which, or picking apart why one side or the other doesn't make sense in the current day. Maybe you could pull it off if made better, but that kind of dissection of the movie seems inevitable set in the US in the presentI liked it for the most part. I didn't get as annoyed by the journalist focus as some reviews have. Making the journalists the focus avoids the perspective problem of a traditional war movie, where the audience only sees one side's viewpoint.
The movie is about the horrors of war, and uses a war in the U.S. to make it feel more visceral for American audiences. While reviewers, and Zoo, focus on which side in the movie represents which side in modern America, I don't think it matters. The movie is a cautionary tale about a modern society unraveling, and does not want viewers cheering for either side. America is not immune to a society getting so unstable that it turns on itself.
I do think the movie is too optimistic about what an America fighting a Civil War would look like. America has such a complicated and urbanized economy that deindustrialization would result in mass starvation and rapid fragmentation of our society.
The movie itself is OK. It has some slow spots, and the slow motion shots would be more effective if the director didn't do one every 5 minutes. The acting was decent. I like Wagner Maura and Caelee Spaeny, Dunst was OK and Henderson plays the same character in everything he does. I didn't love the ending for Dunst's character, and thought it undermined the movie a bit.
The movie was decent, and it makes an important point. I would give a mild recommendation.
Pretty sure it was Graham Hancock I saw that pointed out that Archeology isn't exactly a "hard science" per se, because most archeological finds are total accidents. They're excavating a site for construction and.... well, look what we found.Those shows are fun too, but he isn't suggesting aliens, just a little different take on history. There's certainly a lot archeologists have gotten wrong over the years.
Just saw A Complete Unknown in theaters. Really good, as with most well done biopics, the performance is better than the movie as a whole, but the movie itself was very good itself. It wasn’t as much as a tribute to the life as other music biopics have been, it was a good story about Dylan’s rise.
But, Chalamet put in an amazing performance, his portrayal was terrific. Deserves best actor at the Oscar’s, but I haven’t seen The Brutalist yet, and Brody won Best Actor at the GG’s.
I haven’t seen Emilia Perez, but from what I’ve heard I am not sure I will. I heard Saldana was great. But, there seems to be a lot of outrage at the awards it received last night. This hasn’t been an overly impressive year for films, so a lot of the Oscar’s awards seem pretty wide open. Definitely want to see Anora as well as I’m Still Here though.I'd like to see both of those movies.
I watched Emilia Perez because I was out of the country and Netflix was the only available streaming service. The acting by the lead (Gascon) and Saldana was very good (I'm not sure why Gomez got a GG nom -- she was fine but the role gave her little to work with), but the story was pretty meh. I'm not talking about the subject matter (a Mexican cartel leader getting a sex change); I just thought that, even accepting the premise, some of the plot turns and character developments were quite silly.
We saw it in the theater. Exactly what you think it is. It does that as well as you might expect. I thought it was funI didn't watch it, but "Red One" is available on Amazon Prime already. I'm almost curious to see if it is as bad as all the reviews say it is.