Compared to the Marvel movies I've seen lately, just ok sounds pretty darn good to me.Black Adam
It was just OK.
After having been to Flanders and taking a WW1 tour, I'm very critical of movies that don't depict the total wasteland and harsh conditions in the trenches. This movie captures that very well. The few moments of humor once the horrors of war sink in are dark, borne of desperation. The movie was as depressing as the book as it should be.All Quiet on the Western Front. Netflix. German with subtitles. Cinematically gorgeous, even when portraying ugly, horrible things, which is most of the time. Flares over a smoke filled stretch of battlefield for example. Daniel Bruhl is the only actor that is well known here, but the cast does a really good job. What it does well, as any good WWI movie should, is strip away any false sense of glory from the reality of war. The kids signing up early in the film thought they'd see glory and honor, and were met with cold, death, mud and relentless horror. I liked 1917 better, it's more entertaining and novel, but it was refreshing to see this one from the German perspective. Unlike WWII, there really weren't good or bad guys in this war. Long, a bit slow at times, but recommended. Also recommend the Museum of the Great War if you are in France (we stopped on the way from Paris to Bruges).
Agreed. I don't think the movie needs to be depressing to convey that. 1917 was tense, taught and you felt more of the fear. Wipers Times was funny, but was indeed conveying the reality of misery and honestly, stupidity or the war.After having been to Flanders and taking a WW1 tour, I'm very critical of movies that don't depict the total wasteland and harsh conditions in the trenches. This movie captures that very well. The few moments of humor once the horrors of war sink in are dark, borne of desperation. The movie was as depressing as the book as it should be.
My point was more that the book was as depressing as they come for war books, and the movie stayed true to that instead of lightening up the story.Agreed. I don't think the movie needs to be depressing to convey that. 1917 was tense, taught and you felt more of the fear. Wipers Times was funny, but was indeed conveying the reality of misery and honestly, stupidity or the war.
Enola Holmes 2. Netflix. Millie Bobby Brown (Enola), Henry Cavill (Sherlock), Helena Bonham Carter (their mother) and Louis Partridge (Tewkesbury). They paid Millie quite a bit for this. Picks up where the other left off, more or less. There is some flashback/backstory for anyone who didn't see the original. Stylistically, it's like the first one, which uses the Ferris Bueller approach of the lead character narrating to the audience at times. It was more effective in the first movie but still works. It's not as fun or clever as the original, but is still pretty good. There is a Sherlock Holmes style mystery to be solved, and Moriarty is introduced. There's a real event at the heart of this story, the Matchgirls’ Strike of 1888. There's something endearing about the character Enola that carries it, so credit to Millie for that.
I liked it, but it was a bit of a mess. It seems to me there is a trend with some movies of late to spend too much time rapidly setting up the entire movie. Much like that last of the new Star Wars movies where they had to re-tell a lot of the story to reset from the Last Jedi debacle. This Thor movie suffered badly from that. Once it settled into the story, it was at least decent. But that first 30-40 minutes was hectic and shoddy. A lot of George Lucas-esque quick half-assed takes cobbled together. I really enjoy movies that can pull you in with a slow burn style. This is the exact opposite, and for me, a huge turn off.Marvel just keeps sinking to new lows. "Thor: Love and Thunder" was awful. Just so dumb. Buffoonish. Not funny even though they tried way to hard to be. Gorr could've been a good villain in a different movie but was wasted here. Everything was a waste. Taika Waititi is dead to me after this mess. But Guns N Roses must've made a boatload of money off this stinker, I think at least 4 of their songs were featured. And we got Dio's "Rainbows in the Dark" playing during the end credits, so at least it had that going for it. Disney really is out to murder the golden goose with the MCU.
Tend to agree, but the last half hour of the movie made it for me. The first three quarters was very nostalgic and formulaic and if it had just ended there, I would have been similarly disappointed. Instead, they went off script and it ended on a very high note IMO.Finally watched "Top Gun Maverick." I certainly enjoyed it, but I must totally be missing something. I can't believe how hyped up this movie was, the experience did not match the fanfare for me. Mav trying to reconcile with Goose's son was compelling. The romance felt totally shoehorned in and out of place. Mav and Iceman sharing a moment together felt like it was totally for the nostalgia and was given so little screen time, it didn't really fit either. We got some character development with the new crop of hotshot pilots, but not that much, then it was a rush to get to the mission. And why does no one seem to be picking apart how ludicrous some of the plot was? We practically had a "let go and use the Force, Luke" kind of moment in this, only there's no Force to use. In addition to borrowing from Star Wars, then we got a VERY condensed version of "Behind Enemy Lines" squeezed in. There were probably even a few dashes of "Stealth" thrown in here. It was entertaining, but the many reviews making it out to be one of the best movies ever make me wonder if others saw a different film than I did. For me, Kosinski's previous film w/ Cruise "Oblivion" was much better. Nostalgia is a powerful drug y'all.
Okay, had to look up the director on IMDB. He did "Only the Brave." That was a massively superior film to this. Interestingly Miles Teller and Jennifer Connelly were both in that.
Black Panther: Wakanda Forever. Went last night with my daughter, home from college. There is an element of tribute to Chadwick Boseman here, and I think that’s fine. The story is mostly pretty decent, although the overselling of technology and “vibranium“ is a bit much. It’s a metal people. The new MIT genius is ok I guess. If any of you remember the old Sub-Mariner (Namor) from the comics, well he makes his arrival in this. They changed his backstory and made him a sort of bad guy. Wakanda is in trouble because it won’t do what he wants and battle ensues. They need a new Black Panther to take on Namor, who will it be. Cinematography is pretty good, CGI and otherwise. I do appreciate the colors in Africa and in this one, in Haiti. Costumes are excellent.
That fits with this. They changed his back story a bit but he’s kinda of a heavy, but not evil. This movie is pretty decent really.Namor was always sort of the bad guy in the original Fantastic Four comics. He has a thing for Suzie and she liked him too. That set up a romantic triangle between The Submariner, the Invisible Girl and Mr. Fantastic. Great stuff. Namor didn't like the land people because they were screwing up the ocean. Have NOT seen WF, but the original Namor back story always had him as sort of a bad guy, he was definitely a heavy.