Rate the 2018 UConn Early Signing Class | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Rate the 2018 UConn Early Signing Class

Compared to other classes this decade, how would you rate this year's early signing class?

  • A Step Forward

    Votes: 39 22.5%
  • Marginal Improvement

    Votes: 40 23.1%
  • Hard to Tell

    Votes: 50 28.9%
  • Pretty Much the Same

    Votes: 34 19.7%
  • Marginal Decline

    Votes: 4 2.3%
  • A Step Backward

    Votes: 6 3.5%

  • Total voters
    173

Redding Husky

UConn & SMU alum
Joined
Mar 12, 2015
Messages
2,131
Reaction Score
5,373
Yeah, I've really enjoyed the emails so far but I had the same takeaway. @huskymedic's rolling offer list proves that it's not for lack of trying, but more a result of 8 years of garbage football. Start to turn things around on the field and the recruiting classes will look better.
That's a 'chicken or the egg' conundrum, and it's virtually unsolvable.

You can't recruit better until you play better.

You can't play better until you recruit better.

This is our hellish status in 2018.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
4,176
Reaction Score
10,656
I don’t think these recruiting rankings mean much once you get past the top 30 or so programs. You can become a top 40-50 program by recruiting smart and doing a good job with development. I’m absolutely convinced the recruiting sites gear they’re evaluations to the programs recruiting kids. While that tells you something, it’s far from fool proof. The sites don’t get an accurate read on actual offers and they have limited skills to assess talent.

Years ago Dallas Jackson from TOS was a classic example of the limitations those sites have.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
1,485
Reaction Score
2,587
I think the top 3 in this classs are better than the top 3 last year based solely on what the posted films looked like at the time of signing. The rest are comparable to last year. This is also a thin haul for the early period. I would have hoped for 15+. Even with the non-announced letters, it is still thin.

I hope the majority of these players get the full year to redshirt.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
4,176
Reaction Score
10,656
I think the top 3 in this classs are better than the top 3 last year based solely on what the posted films looked like at the time of signing. The rest are comparable to last year. This is also a thin haul for the early period. I would have hoped for 15+. Even with the non-announced letters, it is still thin.

I hope the majority of these players get the full year to redshirt.

The redshirt point is a very good one. Sustained success for a program like UCONN requires that we get fast kids that need time to physically mature.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,880
Reaction Score
10,042
The redshirt point is a very good one. Sustained success for a program like UCONN requires that we get fast kids that need time to physically mature.

That concept was the start of the Diaco downfall. He thought his recruits were better and ready for action as freshmen and burned redshirts too quickly. He was treating UConn recruits like Notre Dame 4 & 5 stars. The 4 game redshirt rule is a difference maker for teams like UConn. This is also where grad transfers can make a tremendous difference. They fill a spot that saves a year of eligibility for a freshman
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,788
Reaction Score
10,064
My only issue with this “can’t find hidden diamonds” anymore is summed up as follows: Tyler Matakevich (Trumbull, Ct. 6-1 235)...

If you think it’s tough to recruit at UConn, imagine at Temple. Here’s a kid who would have given his left nut to play at UConn, but we were too good for him.

I always thought it was a grades issue with Tyler.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,449
Reaction Score
4,489
They are still ranked dead last in the AAC and in the 130's nation wide. That is not good at all. Unless over half the commits so far are diamonds in the rough(which we won't see for at least two seasons anyways) UConn isn't even treading water. Ranked around #6 in the conference would be treading water.

The last thing the team needs right now is yet another coaching upheaval. What did Edsall or the AD expect Crocker and the other coaches do with a team full of freshmen and sophomores? So now that a lot of those freshmen have a season under their belt they are asked to start all over again with new strength and conditioning and a different defensive scheme. All I can say is the new crew better be damn good recruiters.
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
1,633
Reaction Score
3,875
This poll was voted on by homers with blind folds on. This was not a good recruiting class. Horrible and a step backwards.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
20,662
Reaction Score
49,477
This poll was voted on by homers with blind folds on. This was not a good recruiting class. Horrible and a step backwards.
There is no way in hell that this class is a step backwards compared to last year.
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
1,633
Reaction Score
3,875
There is no way in hell that this class is a step backwards compared to last year.
Not last year (coaching change) but I believe the question was the last decade. This is one of our worst classes.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
87,408
Reaction Score
325,716
Not last year (coaching change) but I believe the question was the last decade. This is one of our worst classes.

Last year was Edsall (and staff's) first full recruiting class - the coaching change class was the year before (2017)...
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,425
Reaction Score
38,300
Can't see how this class isnt already better than anything going back to 2013 and we have at least seven more slots to fill, maybe as many as 10.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,228
Reaction Score
14,061
Not last year (coaching change) but I believe the question was the last decade. This is one of our worst classes.
We're getting more 3 stars than when we were getting started in the Big East. What's wrong with some of you?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,397
Reaction Score
31,031
Interesting article about All-Pro linemen from the last decade. Not many with a lot of stars.
#1. Find the kids that love the game.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
1,209
Reaction Score
1,376
My only issue with this “can’t find hidden diamonds” anymore is summed up as follows: Tyler Matakevich (Trumbull, Ct. 6-1 235)...

If you think it’s tough to recruit at UConn, imagine at Temple. Here’s a kid who would have given his left nut to play at UConn, but we were too good for him.

The fact that he played as a true frosh indicated, to me, that UConn's admission requirements went beyond NCAA Clearing House requirements which, if true, is a significant disadvantage.

In an article written later, Tyler's HS coach mentioned that he warned him about UConn' requirements.
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
1,633
Reaction Score
3,875
Honestly we need to recruit fans as much as players. Awful fair weathered fan base.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
782
Reaction Score
2,847
This is a tough sell. Generally have to recruit outside of New England, CT kids that are 4/5 stars look down at UConn, we are not in a P5 conf and have no true rivalries (gimmicky trophies aside), we have little D1 history and we have not been good for a decade. If you subscribe to that, this portion of the class was decent. HCRE needs about 3-4 more of these to get us back to where we were. But it is a start.
You have to start somewhere. Army, after a long dismal period is pounding people. People debated whether they could compete at this level given their restrictions. Ask Houston if they compete?
It didn't happen in a season or two either.
 

Online statistics

Members online
413
Guests online
2,769
Total visitors
3,182

Forum statistics

Threads
156,874
Messages
4,068,505
Members
9,950
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom