Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SECONN, post: 3138509, member: 5484"]
I am referring in my post as to what the NCAA would do.....nothing regarding anything criminal.

He was not offered money given the state of UCONN basketball, so only he knows what he would have done if it was offered.

His character was not called into question on that issue.  Nor does it support your position.

NCAA investigations are not criminal investigations nor are they looking into whether a crime was committed unless the investigation uncovers one.

So when you connect the dots of what happened in Washington with Fultz, and then the meeting.......the NCAA might just be a little concerned that, from what I understand, was a private meeting in a Las Vegas Hotel with Dawkins and representatives of Addias and not Nike.

He may very well have an explanation, and I understand his purpose of being in Las Vegas was legitimate......but after this trial, the NCAA will have an opportunity to get the entire transcript from the meeting..........and in my opinion, the best possible position for UCONN  is that he is no longer employed here.

It may support his character or not........but UCONN does not need to be in any cross hairs of the NCAA again.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach