- Joined
- May 27, 2015
- Messages
- 14,277
- Reaction Score
- 95,873
Diggins would be playing more if Polley was gone, that would open up another 20 minutes a game for Martin and Jackson to be playing in their correct role as a 3. Gaffney certainly hasn't earned those minutes at the 2 so that's where I think Diggins playing time would come from.I can understand it a bit with Samson because of Sanogo and Whaley in front of him and a couple guys who can slide to the four when we go small but he still should've gotten more minutes in the early going. Diggins I don't understand at all, we don't have a backup point guard and Gaffney has played a ton of minutes here playing every game of his career.
Hurley made a huge mistake in roster construction this offseason thinking Gaff would be the guy and not bringing in one or two transfers at guard and he's doubling down on it not giving Diggins minutes. You have to be able to live with freshman mistakes when your veteran is giving you nothing. Gaff is a really nice kid and he's trying so I don't mean to disparage him but this is big boy college basketball and his play doesn't even come close to cutting it and it's put a tremendous burden on Cole. Gaffney is averaging 5 ppg on the season 33% fg and 29% from the three. Over his last 12 games he's averaging 2.8 ppg and 0% from three.
I don't disagree that Hurley made a big mistake thinking he could count on Gaffney, we'd be a much better team with a legit 2nd ball handler on the team to play next to Cole and give him breathers. But Gaffney has barely been playing the past month after Hurley called him out publicly. He's down to around 9 minutes a game and I guess those minutes could be going to Diggins, but at this point there's not much to suggest he should be doing that other than blind hope. Just because he didn't make the adjustment people here wanted when cutting Gaff's minutes (playing Diggins) doesn't mean the adjustment wasn't made (more Jackson as a point forward while Cole sits).