Race for 1 Seed (2/5) | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Race for 1 Seed (2/5)

There aren’t really any teams that particularly scare me (including Arizona). If we shoot it well and don’t have a -20 free throw differential we’re going to win and advance. We’ve already shown we are better than many of the top 15 teams. I don’t really care if we’re a 1, 2 or 3 seed. If we start rolling like 2023/24 we’re not gonna lose. I still don’t know if this team has “it” yet, but damn we do have a lot of pieces to the puzzle.
 
There aren’t really any teams that particularly scare me (including Arizona). If we shoot it well and don’t have a -20 free throw differential we’re going to win and advance. We’ve already shown we are better than many of the top 15 teams. I don’t really care if we’re a 1, 2 or 3 seed. If we start rolling like 2023/24 we’re not gonna lose. I still don’t know if this team has “it” yet, but damn we do have a lot of pieces to the puzzle.
There are no unbeatable taems this year, no. There are poor matchups though. There are no teams like the F4 last year, which would simply overpower us.

Right now everyone is seeing AZ & UM as the final. We'll see how good these two teams are over the next month. They pass the eye test, pass the metrics test and both have a number of NBA profiles in their starting 5.
 
There are no unbeatable taems this year, no. There are poor matchups though. There are no teams like the F4 last year, which would simply overpower us.

Right now everyone is seeing AZ & UM as the final. We'll see how good these two teams are over the next month. They pass the eye test, pass the metrics test and both have a number of NBA profiles in their starting 5.
Come on now. We played against the team that won it all, and we didn't get "simply overpowered." We're also better this year than last year.

You say some weird stuff.
 
Come on now. We played against the team that won it all, and we didn't get "simply overpowered." We're also better this year than last year.

You say some weird stuff.
If we played that UF team with our team last year 9 more times, UF would win all 9 and likely decidedly. We were up by 1 over a meh Oklahoma team with 4 minutes to go the game prior. So would that Oklahoma team give those F4 teams a run? That Uconn team wasn't good. We were owned by Creighton a week prior. As flukey as Oklahoma played us close was as flukey we played Florida close.
 
If we played that UF team with our team last year 9 more times, UF would win all 9 and likely decidedly. We were up by 1 over a meh Oklahoma team with 4 minutes to go the game prior. So would that Oklahoma team give those F4 teams a run? That Uconn team wasn't good. We were owned by Creighton a week prior. As flukey as Oklahoma played us close was as flukey we played Florida close.
lol if we played them 9 more times and Florida played the way they played in that game the other 9 times we’d probably win most all of them. Our best shooters bricked wide open 3s the whole game and we still almost won.
 
Come on now. We played against the team that won it all, and we didn't get "simply overpowered." We're also better this year than last year.

You say some weird stuff.
He’s never going to give a favorable or UConn leaning view. Like ever. I’ve just excepted who he is lol
 
.-.
If we played that UF team with our team last year 9 more times, UF would win all 9 and likely decidedly. We were up by 1 over a meh Oklahoma team with 4 minutes to go the game prior. So would that Oklahoma team give those F4 teams a run? That Uconn team wasn't good. We were owned by Creighton a week prior. As flukey as Oklahoma played us close was as flukey we played Florida close.
You have some awful takes, but this one may take the cake. Did you actually watch the game last year?

Like @7774 said, we shot 28% from 3. Meanwhile Florida shot 47% from deep. If Solo doesn't turn the ball up 3 late, I think we win that game. UConn played their B/B- game and almost won.
 
It's not even about that anymore. His takes have just became plain stupid.
Well that tracks. When you only have negative/contrarian views on the dominant program of the last 3-4 years, then your views are inherently stupid.
 
If we played that UF team with our team last year 9 more times, UF would win all 9 and likely decidedly. We were up by 1 over a meh Oklahoma team with 4 minutes to go the game prior. So would that Oklahoma team give those F4 teams a run? That Uconn team wasn't good. We were owned by Creighton a week prior. As flukey as Oklahoma played us close was as flukey we played Florida close.
Your worst take in weeks. Congrats
 
Your worst take in weeks. Congrats
It's literally hysterical that you think that Uconn team would have ANY ability to do anything against those F4 teams. That's when I KNOW there is zero objectivity. Did you see Maui? Did you watch the BE tournament? That Florida game was a nice flukey consolation prize. We were fighting to get into the tournament. We would have gone 0-12 if we played those 4 teams 3x. '

Why even pretend? I don't get it. Is it soothing? You're acting like that UConn team was F4 caliber? Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? It was a bad basketball team by Uconn standards. That was one of the more dominant F4's of all time. And you think it's an awful take? Let me get every national analyst to weigh in and see what they think.
Well that tracks. When you only have negative/contrarian views on the dominant program of the last 3-4 years, then your views are inherently stupid.
I'll be the first one to acknowledge how good the 23-24 teams were. Last year that team wasn't good. It's well documented. Yet for some reason we want to hold on to some mirage that they were F4 caliber? Give.me.a.break.
 
lol if we played them 9 more times and Florida played the way they played in that game the other 9 times we’d probably win most all of them. Our best shooters bricked wide open 3s the whole game and we still almost won.
Here's the catch - they likely wouldn't play the way they did that game. They won the NC against one of the stronger fields in recent memory. Certain posters here want to translate select outcomes as a team that was NC caliber.

Last years team stunk. They caught an exceptional Florida team off guard.
 
.-.
Oh Ruff Ruff, I really thought you had turned the corner a week or so ago. You are the posting equivalent of how many feel about Malachi, virtually unplay(read)able. I don't feel that way about Malachi, just think there is a way to unlock his potential through the substitution patterns as well as reinforcing what his game should look like. Hope the key is found in the next few weeks, both for Malachi and Ruff Ruff!!
 
Here's the catch - they likely wouldn't play the way they did that game. They won the NC against one of the stronger fields in recent memory. Certain posters here want to translate select outcomes as a team that was NC caliber.

Last years team stunk. They caught an exceptional Florida team off guard.
You have a hilariously poor understanding of what the sport of college basketball is at its core. You prove it with every post.
 
You have a hilariously poor understanding of what the sport of college basketball is at its core. You prove it with every post.
And what is that? Please explain with your widsom. I think I know what that is. If it's the cinderella run thing, then I'm sorry to disappoint you that those are going away fast.

We had no chance to go deep last year. I know we like to cling to that notion.
 
It's literally hysterical that you think that Uconn team would have ANY ability to do anything against those F4 teams. That's when I KNOW there is zero objectivity. Did you see Maui? Did you watch the BE tournament? That Florida game was a nice flukey consolation prize. We were fighting to get into the tournament. We would have gone 0-12 if we played those 4 teams 3x. '

Why even pretend? I don't get it. Is it soothing? You're acting like that UConn team was F4 caliber? Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? It was a bad basketball team by Uconn standards. That was one of the more dominant F4's of all time. And you think it's an awful take? Let me get every national analyst to weigh in and see what they think.

I'll be the first one to acknowledge how good the 23-24 teams were. Last year that team wasn't good. It's well documented. Yet for some reason we want to hold on to some mirage that they were F4 caliber? Give.me.a.break.
YOU’RE DOING HYPOTHETICALS ON A GAME WE ALL SAW!

Honestly insane
 
YOU’RE DOING HYPOTHETICALS ON A GAME WE ALL SAW!

Honestly insane
What is your take man? That we had a team that could go into that F4 and win games? I'm honesty not sure what your take is? That we were as good as Florida? What is your contrary take? I'd like to hear it. Lay it out for me. Pose the argument rather than call out the poster. I'm saying last years Uconn team would go 0-12 against last year's F4. What is your view?
 
.-.
And what is that? Please explain with your widsom. I think I know what that is. If it's the cinderella run thing, then I'm sorry to disappoint you that those are going away fast.

We had no chance to go deep last year. I know we like to cling to that notion.
You're talking about the Florida juggernaut that was down 9 to Texas Tech with 3 minutes to go in the tournament and had to pull that game out right? Yeah I don't know how any team would be able to beat that team even once if they played 10 times.
 
You're talking about the Florida juggernaut that was down 9 to Texas Tech with 3 minutes to go in the tournament and had to pull that game out right? Yeah I don't know how any team would be able to beat that team even once if they played 10 times.
Texas Tech was a really good 3 seed. We were an 8 seed.

We didn't beat anyone better than an 8 seed that whole year.

 
Last edited:
What is your take man? That we had a team that could go into that F4 and win games? I'm honesty not sure what your take is? That we were as good as Florida? What is your contrary take? I'd like to hear it. Lay it out for me. Pose the argument rather than call out the poster. I'm saying last years Uconn team would go 0-12 against last year's F4. What is your view?
My take is that we played Florida and led for 38 minutes. If we’d been blown out I’m still not sure we go 0-12, but we didn’t. To say we’d have no chance flies in the face of what we all watched.

You’re so convinced the analytics have the answers that you ignore games as they actually happen
 
Here's the catch - they likely wouldn't play the way they did that game. They won the NC against one of the stronger fields in recent memory. Certain posters here want to translate select outcomes as a team that was NC caliber.

Last years team stunk. They caught an exceptional Florida team off guard.
Florida had an incredibly flimsy run where they were playing catchup to all sorts of opponents and if I can recall, we attempted about 14 more shots than they did and uncharacteristically bricked them. They also swatted rebounds into Florida’s hands at the FT line.
 
No one is arguing we were a title contender other than in some fluke run. We are taking issue with the idea that we couldn’t possibly beat Florida, when, in the real world, that nearly happened

Honestly hard to see how that’s controversial
 
.-.
. Yet for some reason we want to hold on to some mirage that they were F4 caliber? Give.me.a.break.

Here you go lying again. Please point me to who said this.

You are the king of strawman arguments
 

Forum statistics

Threads
166,992
Messages
4,501,987
Members
10,375
Latest member
dr...


Top Bottom