MilfordHusky
Voice of Reason
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 37,364
- Reaction Score
- 127,137
UConn has been in the pre-season top-10 for 30 years in a row, meanwhile Stanford and Tennessee are unranked.
I have OU ahead of LSU in the SEC. The sooners bombed out in the tourney so everyone forgets they had a good year AND they added Bears.ND above UCLA 1000%. The voters are on something for that one. LSU needs to be a bit lower, maybe 10-11.
I believe in the right to arm Bears!!!I have OU ahead of LSU in the SEC. The sooners bombed out in the tourney so everyone forgets they had a good year AND they added Bears.
ND above UCLA 1000%. The voters are on something for that one. LSU needs to be a bit lower, maybe 10-11.
When is ND ever healthy at the beginning of the season?:-(What do you base that on? UCLA probably has the deepest frontcourt in the country. Seems like ND won't be 100% healthy to start the season.
2024-25 Women's Basketball Roster - UCLA
The official 2024-25 Women's Basketball Roster for the UCLA Bruinsuclabruins.com
Well, I‘m not so sure about whether they should be ranked right now, but I do believe they will be ranked at some point this season. (Assuming of course, that the new coach, the longtime key assistant to Lisa Bluder doesn’t let the side down) If Lucy Olson can develop a good chemistry with Hannah Stuelke and the rest of the team, they should certainly be OK on the offensive side. I’m not sure who all is in their rookie class but one player in particular imo, (Ava Heiden) is going to be a star. Perhaps not right away, but I do think she will be a force in the post for them. Stuelke and Olson will be a force to be reckoned with, so if the rest of the team can help on the offensive side, they will be fine. The defensive side is where my concern would be. If they can just be decent defensively, they will be fine.I think voters nailed the top 10, though South Carolina deserves to be unanimous #1.
Iowa should be top 25, even without Clark. They still have Stuehlke, Affolter, and Ol n.
Not sure why they should be unanimous! They did lose their big stud center and now are facing the possible loss of her heir apparent in Watkins as well. I just don’t see them as some unbeatable juggernaut, which is my criteria for a unanimous pick. Should they be #1? Sure, they are defending champions and even if they do lose Watkins (either temporarily or more) they still have a formidable roster!They absolutely should have been unanimous #1, but it doesn't really matter.
As far as ranking, at this point, early in the season, I would agree, but due to possible chemistry (lot of shooters who like the same spots on the floor) and not player(s) being unknown or unproven. Kaitlyn Chen is a proven problem. Strong may be new, and I rarely get excited about freshman, but I'm all in here with confidence. I'm watching two players this year to solidify a one or two ranking come March...Azzi Fudd and Jana El Alfy.I hate to say it, but I think that UConn at #2 is a bit high. Except for Paige, KK, and Shade, there are a lot of unknown (coming back from injuries) and unproven (new players). I would put them on the top 5, but not #2. Not that the pre-season ranking matters much.
Coaching. Close doesn’t seem to know X and O unlike Ivey.What do you base that on? UCLA probably has the deepest frontcourt in the country. Seems like ND won't be 100% healthy to start the season.
2024-25 Women's Basketball Roster - UCLA
The official 2024-25 Women's Basketball Roster for the UCLA Bruinsuclabruins.com
Close has a great school to recruit to, UCLA has a storied history in WBB and there is tremendous HS talent on the West Coast. But yes, through the years, Close has come up short with really talented teams.Coaching. Close doesn’t seem to know X and O unlike Ivey.
Horrible misuse of Betts/guard play lost them the game vs LSU. Coaching mishap cost them the OSU game and the PAC 12 title. Close has had 2 years worth of a roster that under any other coach, like Dawn, Geno, Ivey, Vic, etc would’ve gotten to a Final four. She hasn’t even made an Elite 8.
Coaching. Close doesn’t seem to know X and O unlike Ivey.
Horrible misuse of Betts/guard play lost them the game vs LSU. Coaching mishap cost them the OSU game and the PAC 12 title. Close has had 2 years worth of a roster that under any other coach, like Dawn, Geno, Ivey, Vic, etc would’ve gotten to a Final four. She hasn’t even made an Elite 8.
Niele Ivey (ACC) (2020–present) | |||||
2020–21 | Niele Ivey | 10–10 | 8–7 | 6th | |
2021–22 | Niele Ivey | 24–10 | 13–5 | T-3rd | NCAA Sweet Sixteen |
2022–23 | Niele Ivey | 27–6 | 15–3 | 1st | NCAA Sweet Sixteen |
2023–24 | Niele Ivey | 28–7 | 13–5 | T-2nd | NCAA Sweet Sixteen |
Close has a great school to recruit to, UCLA has a storied history in WBB and there is tremendous HS talent on the West Coast. But yes, through the years, Close has come up short with really talented teams.
This year, UCLA is loaded. Can Close finally get the Bruins over the hump? We’ll see……
Coaching wise though, she clearly outcoached us this season. Outcoached a literal 11 time champion coach.I remember when Ivey squandered a late 10-point lead in a Sweet 16 game against NC State in 2022. Ivey has yet to prove herself on the big stage. Close at least has made a handful of Elite 8's.
Niele Ivey (ACC) (2020–present)2020–21 Niele Ivey 10–10 8–7 6th 2021–22 Niele Ivey 24–10 13–5 T-3rd NCAA Sweet Sixteen 2022–23 Niele Ivey 27–6 15–3 1st NCAA Sweet Sixteen 2023–24 Niele Ivey 28–7 13–5 T-2nd NCAA Sweet Sixteen