- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Messages
- 2,236
- Reaction Score
- 2,482
Team logos really werent used that much before the 90s? I guess that is sort of true. What is Notre Dames? How about UCLA? You are correct in todays internet icon happy world a good mascot or symbol is important . That is why this new husky dog is going to help us. If there is a way to poll random people who know nothing about UCONN to chose the image they would prefer I would bet it would overwhelmingly be the New logo. Just Saying.In fact, that isn't the case. The older Huskies weren't ubiquitous like the 1990-2013 variations were. In part it was simply that team logos weren't used that much before the 90s and in part it is a function of UConn's period of greatest success at high levels. If you were around and watching the games during the Dream Season, the Huskies were referred to by the NCAA Tourney play by play guys (I think Nance was one) as "The UCONNS" because nobody at CBS was exactly sure of their mascot in the early games.
As far as Nike goes, they have a corporate image that they play to. And that's part of the problem. The pretty much took a generic Husky/Wolf piece of clipart, outlined it in red and slapped a blue toupee an top, and bingo...Donald the Toupee Dog was born. Cheap, easy to reproduce, short shelf life. They'll probably use it as the basis for the next update of Washington or Southern Maine or New Mexico, so it was worth the (minimal) investment of time. Change the color, throw in a couple of teeth and you've got a lobo.