With respect to the gulf between the top two or three and everyone else we are moving away from parity not closerSame here, I only remember the St. John's game. That's the only game we lost that we overwhelmingly should have won. That's why I like our gals so much - consistancy. They don't lose games that they should win, i.e. to obviously inferior teams.
But the closer we get to parity statistics say that an unpredictable loss will ocurr even though we can't think of a team that will beat us. Sooner or later an accident will happen. Even when you're 25 points better than the team you're playing the odds may be say 1/100 or even 1/500. However, when you're only 15 points better the chances for the accident to ocurr increase. It's called Gaussian distribution. Even a 50 to 1 horse wins a race once in a while.
I selected about the same or slightly better. Defense is, as it was, the difference.
When (in recent times) has Kiah "melted" in big games? I don't remember a single big game this past season (certainly not in the NCAA tournament) where she did not do her normal excellent++ job of rebounding and shot blocking. She was not counted on to score and did not score much, but showed some signs that she could do that too (although not as a primary scoring option).In order to be better imo three things must happen:
1-- Morgan Tuck needs to be real good.
2-- Two of the freshmen or Saniya and one frosh must be contributors so when one is off the other can contrubute in a positive manner.
3-- In big games Kiah can't melt.
Of course if Morgan Tuck is very good/excellent it's okay if Kiah melts.
If one of the freshmen orr Saniya is real good and Morgan and Kiah play well then of course the 2nd player not quite as important. I'm looking forward to see all the frosh and to see how Saniya does. .
Not to mention a pair of 50% 3-point shooters with nearly unlimited range.
Other than KML, who is the second shooter you're referring to?
and KML/Courtney keeping the defense honest,
When (in recent times) has Kiah "melted" in big games? I don't remember a single big game this past season (certainly not in the NCAA tournament) where she did not do her normal excellent++ job of rebounding and shot blocking. She was not counted on to score and did not score much, but showed some signs that she could do that too (although not as a primary scoring option).
If she impacts the game in 2014-15 with rebounding and shot blocking, and does so for 30 minutes, and scores as a secondary option (e.g., on putbacks or when the defense is drawn away from her by other threats), she will more than adequately fill the starter's position at center. I think averages of 8 points, 12 rebounds, and 3-to-5 blocks per 30-minute game are a realistic expectation.