The best athlete thread got me thinking of this. Which players had the most "game"? By that I mean they weren't necessarily the best shooter or dribbler or dunker or athlete or defender, but they just had mad game. Maybe it was force of personality or smarts or just gymrattness, but they could just play. These are the kind of guys that look much better playing in a game than they probably did in practice.
1) Chris Smith - is there any debate? Look at some of the rosters he took to the NCAA tournament, but he wasn't good enough at anything in particular to hang on more than a handful of years as a backup in the NBA.
2) KEA - how does a guy that is 25 pounds overweight with a 5' wingspan dominate like he did?
3) Bazz - he has some big measurable skills, particularly with his shooting, but the whole is certainly much, much bigger than the sum of his component parts.
4) Henefeld - there were games where he would have a very thin stat sheet and still seem to dominate. Turned a bubble team into a Dream Season.
5) KFree - no one worked harder and seemed to do more with modest natural ability and skill than KFree. It was certainly a little dusty in my living room the afternoon he walked off the court for the last time into Calhoun's arms.
6) Selvie - how was an undersized guy that was an OK athlete by Big East standards such an instrumental part of a team that was a Steve Blake 3 away from the Final 4? He was a complete black hole offensively, but he scored with a high shooting percentage and rebounded well.
Who am I missing?
Guys not on the list:
Scheffer - very quick first step and he was tall. Smart player, but the funky shot actually held him back. This was a guy that had all the pieces to be a star college player, and he was.
Tate - tall guard that was a decent athlete if not super fast.
Kemba - Everyone knew Kemba was going to be a star.
By "Game" I assume you mean the crafty/savvy/know-how that overcomes physical limitations.
C: Tyler Olander - I'm not going to beat up on Tyler here. He is a two-time NCAA CHampion, for F86k's sake. I won't mention his inability to rebound or be in shape. I won't mention his world-class penchant for picking up cheap and-1 fouls. I won't mention that he was so uncoordinated that he failed a sobriety test while stone-sober. I kid, I kid. But he belongs on this list.
can you tell work is slow today?
You had me at "jowl fakes".If KEA's one superlative, lowest center of gravity for a D1 Nat'l Champion, can be overlooked, hes hands down my pick. I just loved watching him make infinitely more conditioned, better athletes look foolish with his head, double chin, then jowl fakes. Although I think M Williams, Adrien, Freeman, and the Israelis are up there too.
The Olander quip was hysterical, no kidding.
I have to add Ben Gordon. He did some amazing stuff off the dribble and was balls-on accurate from 3 point land.The best athlete thread got me thinking of this. Which players had the most "game"? By that I mean they weren't necessarily the best shooter or dribbler or dunker or athlete or defender, but they just had mad game. Maybe it was force of personality or smarts or just gymrattness, but they could just play. These are the kind of guys that look much better playing in a game than they probably did in practice.
1) Chris Smith - is there any debate? Look at some of the rosters he took to the NCAA tournament, but he wasn't good enough at anything in particular to hang on more than a handful of years as a backup in the NBA.
2) KEA - how does a guy that is 25 pounds overweight with a 5' wingspan dominate like he did?
3) Bazz - he has some big measurable skills, particularly with his shooting, but the whole is certainly much, much bigger than the sum of his component parts.
4) Henefeld - there were games where he would have a very thin stat sheet and still seem to dominate. Turned a bubble team into a Dream Season.
5) KFree - no one worked harder and seemed to do more with modest natural ability and skill than KFree. It was certainly a little dusty in my living room the afternoon he walked off the court for the last time into Calhoun's arms.
6) Selvie - how was an undersized guy that was an OK athlete by Big East standards such an instrumental part of a team that was a Steve Blake 3 away from the Final 4? He was a complete black hole offensively, but he scored with a high shooting percentage and rebounded well.
Who am I missing?
Guys not on the list:
Scheffer - very quick first step and he was tall. Smart player, but the funky shot actually held him back. This was a guy that had all the pieces to be a star college player, and he was.
Tate - tall guard that was a decent athlete if not super fast.
Kemba - Everyone knew Kemba was going to be a star.
Could throw down some serious dunks. One on the break at Conte Forum stands out. Took off one step inside the free throw line and threw it down with two hands. Also one of the most unassuming athletes you could ever meet. Nice guy.Lyman DePriest.
Dude could guard four positons easily - I personally watched him lock down Dana Barros twice. Didn't show much offense, but he really didn't need to...
Chris Smith and Henefeld were before my time but I don't get Bazz or KEA being included here, .
I think many in this thread are misinterpreting the meaning of "game." I take the meaning as a combination of basketball IQ, savviness, and overall skill. These types of players have tricks up their sleeves in order to produce in games. They'll sometimes pull out "playground" type moves to abuse the defense.
With this definition, the first player that comes to my mind is Bazz. While he doesn't have blazing speed or unreal athleticism, he often uses his basketball IQ and skill to get in the lane or get fouled. Just my opinion.
I love the Marcus Williams mention up top - perfect for this type of thread.
The best athlete thread got me thinking of this. Which players had the most "game"? By that I mean they weren't necessarily the best shooter or dribbler or dunker or athlete or defender, but they just had mad game. Maybe it was force of personality or smarts or just gymrattness, but they could just play. These are the kind of guys that look much better playing in a game than they probably did in practice.
1) Chris Smith - is there any debate? Look at some of the rosters he took to the NCAA tournament, but he wasn't good enough at anything in particular to hang on more than a handful of years as a backup in the NBA.
2) KEA - how does a guy that is 25 pounds overweight with a 5' wingspan dominate like he did?
3) Bazz - he has some big measurable skills, particularly with his shooting, but the whole is certainly much, much bigger than the sum of his component parts.
4) Henefeld - there were games where he would have a very thin stat sheet and still seem to dominate. Turned a bubble team into a Dream Season.
5) KFree - no one worked harder and seemed to do more with modest natural ability and skill than KFree. It was certainly a little dusty in my living room the afternoon he walked off the court for the last time into Calhoun's arms.
6) Selvie - how was an undersized guy that was an OK athlete by Big East standards such an instrumental part of a team that was a Steve Blake 3 away from the Final 4? He was a complete black hole offensively, but he scored with a high shooting percentage and rebounded well.
Who am I missing?
Guys not on the list:
Scheffer - very quick first step and he was tall. Smart player, but the funky shot actually held him back. This was a guy that had all the pieces to be a star college player, and he was.
Tate - tall guard that was a decent athlete if not super fast.
Kemba - Everyone knew Kemba was going to be a star.