HuskyWarrior611
Mid range white knight
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2011
- Messages
- 6,046
- Reaction Score
- 19,522
Even if we did, Gaffney was averaging 4/2 over 20 minutes while shooting 40% from 2 and 26% from 3. In the final game vs Tulane, he was arguably the worst player on the court.You don’t think we would’ve made the tourney in that shutdown year?
Without Cole and Gaffney as our lead guard? No.You don’t think we would’ve made the tourney in that shutdown year?
You’re talking about the wrong year.Without Cole and Gaffney as our lead guard? No.
We would’ve needed to win the AAC Tournament and get thru Tulane, Wichita State, Cincinnati, then likely Houston.You’re talking about the wrong year.
I thought the board was in agreement that the 2019-2020 team was hot and ready to make a run. But maybe people will change their answers for the sake of saying I’m wrong lol
I think they should just simulate the rest of the 2020 season and make it official, yes it would be watered but hey it's better than nothing.We would’ve needed to win the AAC Tournament and get thru Tulane, Wichita State, Cincinnati, then likely Houston.
Probably not happening. We had zero chance of an at-large.
Nice layout.2023:
PG - transfer
SG - 2nd year 4*
SF - 3rd year 4*
PF - freshman 4*
C - 3rd year 4*
2024:
PG - 2nd year transfer
SG - transfer
SF - freshman 5*
PF - 2nd year 4*
C - 2nd year 4*
Skipping this down year, but next year I’m assuming we will have:
PG - transfer
SG - 3rd year 4*
SF - freshman 5*
PF - either transfer, 4th year 4*, or 3rd year 4*
C - 2nd year transfer
UConn both develops its recruits and plugs holes with transfers. That has been a pretty successful formula. The bar is incredibly high in a Dan Hurley system, but if you meet it, your role is secure
The challenge going back to the 2023 template is that it requires devoted rebuild years, maybe 2. It was great for that first NC season as we were ascending back, but not sure it's needed anymore now that we're back in the big leagues. Still important, in a more condensed format.2023:
PG - transfer
SG - 2nd year 4*
SF - 3rd year 4*
PF - freshman 4*
C - 3rd year 4*
2024:
PG - 2nd year transfer
SG - transfer
SF - freshman 5*
PF - 2nd year 4*
C - 2nd year 4*
Skipping this down year, but next year I’m assuming we will have:
PG - transfer
SG - 3rd year 4*
SF - freshman 5*
PF - either transfer, 4th year 4*, or 3rd year 4*
C - 2nd year transfer
UConn both develops its recruits and plugs holes with transfers. That has been a pretty successful formula. The bar is incredibly high in a Dan Hurley system, but if you meet it, your role is secure
Would have been a tough hill to climb but I thought we at least had a shot to make a run. First time in a long time there was a glimmer of hope that we were on our way to bigger things…You’re talking about the wrong year.
I thought the board was in agreement that the 2019-2020 team was hot and ready to make a run. But maybe people will change their answers for the sake of saying I’m wrong lol