Pitino on the state of recruiting | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Pitino on the state of recruiting

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
6,046
Reaction Score
19,522

IMG_7080.jpeg
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2019
Messages
536
Reaction Score
2,559
You don’t think we would’ve made the tourney in that shutdown year?
Even if we did, Gaffney was averaging 4/2 over 20 minutes while shooting 40% from 2 and 26% from 3. In the final game vs Tulane, he was arguably the worst player on the court.

In his first two years here, he averaged 19.2 and 19.4 minutes respectively. Despite Castle and Cam coming in, Diarra got exactly 19.4 MPG last year and was 6th man of the year. Jalen could have done that same thing in spite of the RJ Cole transfer but he didn't. It wasn't because he wasn't given an opportunity.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
6,046
Reaction Score
19,522
Without Cole and Gaffney as our lead guard? No.
You’re talking about the wrong year.

I thought the board was in agreement that the 2019-2020 team was hot and ready to make a run. But maybe people will change their answers for the sake of saying I’m wrong lol
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
10,141
Reaction Score
34,852
You’re talking about the wrong year.

I thought the board was in agreement that the 2019-2020 team was hot and ready to make a run. But maybe people will change their answers for the sake of saying I’m wrong lol
We would’ve needed to win the AAC Tournament and get thru Tulane, Wichita State, Cincinnati, then likely Houston.

Probably not happening. We had zero chance of an at-large.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
11,576
Reaction Score
19,551
We would’ve needed to win the AAC Tournament and get thru Tulane, Wichita State, Cincinnati, then likely Houston.

Probably not happening. We had zero chance of an at-large.
I think they should just simulate the rest of the 2020 season and make it official, yes it would be watered but hey it's better than nothing.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
3,108
Reaction Score
21,947
2023:
PG - transfer
SG - 2nd year 4*
SF - 3rd year 4*
PF - freshman 4*
C - 3rd year 4*

2024:
PG - 2nd year transfer
SG - transfer
SF - freshman 5*
PF - 2nd year 4*
C - 2nd year 4*

Skipping this down year, but next year I’m assuming we will have:
PG - transfer
SG - 3rd year 4*
SF - freshman 5*
PF - either transfer, 4th year 4*, or 3rd year 4*
C - 2nd year transfer

UConn both develops its recruits and plugs holes with transfers. That has been a pretty successful formula. The bar is incredibly high in a Dan Hurley system, but if you meet it, your role is secure
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
3,072
Reaction Score
11,828
2023:
PG - transfer
SG - 2nd year 4*
SF - 3rd year 4*
PF - freshman 4*
C - 3rd year 4*

2024:
PG - 2nd year transfer
SG - transfer
SF - freshman 5*
PF - 2nd year 4*
C - 2nd year 4*

Skipping this down year, but next year I’m assuming we will have:
PG - transfer
SG - 3rd year 4*
SF - freshman 5*
PF - either transfer, 4th year 4*, or 3rd year 4*
C - 2nd year transfer

UConn both develops its recruits and plugs holes with transfers. That has been a pretty successful formula. The bar is incredibly high in a Dan Hurley system, but if you meet it, your role is secure
Nice layout.

There are distinct differences between where we are now and where we were when we recruited Ajax and Sonogo that will likely change the template, but do agree it makes sense to identify 1-2 players that can keep continuity into their upper class years.

The 4 spot is a real wild card for next year.

I also think we need a 3rd transfer combo that is versatile and can defend, if we can find it. Maybe solo makes the leap, but I want an insurance plan in place to get minutes in the event he doesn’t as that team up there looks potentially awful defensively again.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2023
Messages
2,129
Reaction Score
11,090
Recruiting is especially difficult if you’re like Dracula and you have to wait until dark to roll out of your coffin to meet with recruits.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
3,072
Reaction Score
11,828
2023:
PG - transfer
SG - 2nd year 4*
SF - 3rd year 4*
PF - freshman 4*
C - 3rd year 4*

2024:
PG - 2nd year transfer
SG - transfer
SF - freshman 5*
PF - 2nd year 4*
C - 2nd year 4*

Skipping this down year, but next year I’m assuming we will have:
PG - transfer
SG - 3rd year 4*
SF - freshman 5*
PF - either transfer, 4th year 4*, or 3rd year 4*
C - 2nd year transfer

UConn both develops its recruits and plugs holes with transfers. That has been a pretty successful formula. The bar is incredibly high in a Dan Hurley system, but if you meet it, your role is secure
The challenge going back to the 2023 template is that it requires devoted rebuild years, maybe 2. It was great for that first NC season as we were ascending back, but not sure it's needed anymore now that we're back in the big leagues. Still important, in a more condensed format.
 

StllH8L8ner

You’ll get nothing and like it!
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
2,312
Reaction Score
12,763
You’re talking about the wrong year.

I thought the board was in agreement that the 2019-2020 team was hot and ready to make a run. But maybe people will change their answers for the sake of saying I’m wrong lol
Would have been a tough hill to climb but I thought we at least had a shot to make a run. First time in a long time there was a glimmer of hope that we were on our way to bigger things…

Then after several people in my office came down with terrible ‘colds’ including me with a 104 fever, my boss pulled me into his office and said be prepared to work from home for the foreseeable future because the higher ups were moving quickly and something big is happening. I worked for a large Wall St bank and it was really ominous…
 

Online statistics

Members online
42
Guests online
3,368
Total visitors
3,410

Forum statistics

Threads
161,577
Messages
4,269,407
Members
10,110
Latest member
Gordon


.
..
Top Bottom