I hope team Melo can get all their guys to play.. they don’t seem to get all hands on deck in these sessionsCan watch Scotty Middleton 《Brad Beal Elite ) against Solo Ball and Jayden Ross ( Team Melo ) @ 11:00 am. Sunday Game streamed on EYbl site. Not sure if Tafara Gaspare will be playing with BBE or not..
not the prettiest basketball to watch .....
Contrary to Husky429 I think he is pretty good with the ball, (better than Hawkins last year).
I've watched hundreds of top 100 players over the years, and I rejoice when targets commit to UConn. From their commitment date, I enjoy being optimistic every year about the possibilities of our new recruits and what they bring to help us win on the big stage. This time, I've watched 3 1/2 games of Melo and 2 of Beal so far, and I haven't seen a hint of play that would justify high rankings for these guys. Ball, Ross, and Middleton all offer developmental possibilities, but none of them look ready to contribute right away. It's concerning if our roster requires us to rely on them next year. As an individual player, I like Ross so far. Contrary to Husky429 I think he is pretty good with the ball, (better than Hawkins last year). The strength issue shows more because he plays out of position at center for Melo in these recent games. I expected much more effort from Ball than I've seen, and, I've yet to see an athletic play that would distinguish him from the other players on the court. My concern is compounded because they aren't winning games. I don't see how we win The Big East and make deep Ncaa runs if this became our core group. IMO these guys seem most suited to help a team that has a core of alpha players like Clingan, Karaban, Johnson, Castle, portal transfers, etc Diarra seems like he would keep these guys glued to the bench.
I think, together with our current reported targets, we have taken a big step down from the potential of Edwards, Griffi.ths, Bowen, Miranda, Bradshaw, Batulis, Watson, Kante, and more recent names like Estrella, Kingsley, Gafare. All these guys showed something in every game that projected them as top 100 players.
Hurley obviously feels he can make these guys good, and each of them appears to be the type of quality kid that expects to put in the work. I'm routing for them but my fingers are crossed.
I respect your basketball analysis because you've clearly shown you know what you're talking about over the years but I think you're way way off base here. And I could have told you this post was coming from you 2 years ago before anyone committed regardless of who we got. You made up your mind that you wanted the local guys like Griffiths and Bowen and anything other than that was going to be trashed by you.I've watched hundreds of top 100 players over the years, and I rejoice when targets commit to UConn. From their commitment date, I enjoy being optimistic every year about the possibilities of our new recruits and what they bring to help us win on the big stage. This time, I've watched 3 1/2 games of Melo and 2 of Beal so far, and I haven't seen a hint of play that would justify high rankings for these guys. Ball, Ross, and Middleton all offer developmental possibilities, but none of them look ready to contribute right away. It's concerning if our roster requires us to rely on them next year. As an individual player, I like Ross so far. Contrary to Husky429 I think he is pretty good with the ball, (better than Hawkins last year). The strength issue shows more because he plays out of position at center for Melo in these recent games. I expected much more effort from Ball than I've seen, and, I've yet to see an athletic play that would distinguish him from the other players on the court. My concern is compounded because they aren't winning games. I don't see how we win The Big East and make deep Ncaa runs if this became our core group. IMO these guys seem most suited to help a team that has a core of alpha players like Clingan, Karaban, Johnson, Castle, portal transfers, etc Diarra seems like he would keep these guys glued to the bench.
I think, together with our current reported targets, we have taken a big step down from the potential of Edwards, Griffi.ths, Bowen, Miranda, Bradshaw, Batulis, Watson, Kante, and more recent names like Estrella, Kingsley, Gafare. All these guys showed something in every game that projected them as top 100 players.
Hurley obviously feels he can make these guys good, and each of them appears to be the type of quality kid that expects to put in the work. I'm routing for them but my fingers are crossed.
I don’t think the idea is for these guys to be starting immediately sans Castle. Ross is clearly a developmental guy, Solo probably isn’t a starter until year 2 ideally. Scotty might get on the floor for his team if they need his defensive presence, but I agree that he’s over ranked. Edwards and Griffiths were immediate impact guys, but there’s no point in lamenting the misses there.I've watched hundreds of top 100 players over the years, and I rejoice when targets commit to UConn. From their commitment date, I enjoy being optimistic every year about the possibilities of our new recruits and what they bring to help us win on the big stage. This time, I've watched 3 1/2 games of Melo and 2 of Beal so far, and I haven't seen a hint of play that would justify high rankings for these guys. Ball, Ross, and Middleton all offer developmental possibilities, but none of them look ready to contribute right away. It's concerning if our roster requires us to rely on them next year. As an individual player, I like Ross so far. Contrary to Husky429 I think he is pretty good with the ball, (better than Hawkins last year). The strength issue shows more because he plays out of position at center for Melo in these recent games. I expected much more effort from Ball than I've seen, and, I've yet to see an athletic play that would distinguish him from the other players on the court. My concern is compounded because they aren't winning games. I don't see how we win The Big East and make deep Ncaa runs if this became our core group. IMO these guys seem most suited to help a team that has a core of alpha players like Clingan, Karaban, Johnson, Castle, portal transfers, etc Diarra seems like he would keep these guys glued to the bench.
I think, together with our current reported targets, we have taken a big step down from the potential of Edwards, Griffi.ths, Bowen, Miranda, Bradshaw, Batulis, Watson, Kante, and more recent names like Estrella, Kingsley, Gafare. All these guys showed something in every game that projected them as top 100 players.
Hurley obviously feels he can make these guys good, and each of them appears to be the type of quality kid that expects to put in the work. I'm routing for them but my fingers are crossed.
Think it all depends on what happens next year. Newton and Alleyne have extra years of eligibility if they want it. The goal is for Hawkins and Andre to go pro after next year, but if they don't, then we could have our starting PG/SG/SF solidified already. Castle would probably take 6th Man from Alleyne, and then him/Diarra/Ball would share bench backcourt minutes with potential to try some out as a small ball SF. Ross would probably be a multi-year developmental player regardless, and this obviously doesn't include any future commits/transfers.I've watched hundreds of top 100 players over the years, and I rejoice when targets commit to UConn. From their commitment date, I enjoy being optimistic every year about the possibilities of our new recruits and what they bring to help us win on the big stage. This time, I've watched 3 1/2 games of Melo and 2 of Beal so far, and I haven't seen a hint of play that would justify high rankings for these guys. Ball, Ross, and Middleton all offer developmental possibilities, but none of them look ready to contribute right away. It's concerning if our roster requires us to rely on them next year. As an individual player, I like Ross so far. Contrary to Husky429 I think he is pretty good with the ball, (better than Hawkins last year). The strength issue shows more because he plays out of position at center for Melo in these recent games. I expected much more effort from Ball than I've seen, and, I've yet to see an athletic play that would distinguish him from the other players on the court. My concern is compounded because they aren't winning games. I don't see how we win The Big East and make deep Ncaa runs if this became our core group. IMO these guys seem most suited to help a team that has a core of alpha players like Clingan, Karaban, Johnson, Castle, portal transfers, etc Diarra seems like he would keep these guys glued to the bench.
I think, together with our current reported targets, we have taken a big step down from the potential of Edwards, Griffi.ths, Bowen, Miranda, Bradshaw, Batulis, Watson, Kante, and more recent names like Estrella, Kingsley, Gafare. All these guys showed something in every game that projected them as top 100 players.
Hurley obviously feels he can make these guys good, and each of them appears to be the type of quality kid that expects to put in the work. I'm routing for them but my fingers are crossed.
Now that I know who you are, I need to like every one of your posts. Not that it matters. You have the most impressive reaction score to post ratio I’ve seen.Brewster is going to be good for Solo; it’s likely to be the best coaching he’s ever had, considering his AAU and high school experiences. Jason does a nice job, and he’s going to be surrounded by talent. Now Jayden needs to get his figured out.
We might have seen the post coming but that doesn't mean it isn't true. Ricker has championship level expectations for the program and 2023 had the potential to be a monster class given the local talent yet castle is the only championship caliber player he thinks we've landed. It's an objective take even if you might not appreciate his negativity. Idk if he's even being negative he's just really disappointed.I respect your basketball analysis because you've clearly shown you know what you're talking about over the years but I think you're way way off base here. And I could have told you this post was coming from you 2 years ago before anyone committed regardless of who we got. You made up your mind that you wanted the local guys like Griffiths and Bowen and anything other than that was going to be trashed by you.
Now that's not to say the local guys aren't going to be great players, or that Ball/Ross/Middleton are perfect prospects (and we're not even getting Middleton so you can rest easy there). But I feel very confident in saying you're going in with a closed mind when watching these games. This is just an incredibly bad take from you
Ever since what? I'm certainly not a moderator hereWe might have seen the post coming but that doesn't mean it isn't true. Ricker has championship level expectations for the program and 2023 had the potential to be a monster class given the local talent yet castle is the only championship caliber player he thinks we've landed. It's an objective take even if you might not appreciate his negativity. Idk if he's even being negative he's just really disappointed.
after a rocky start you and I have gotten along for a couple years now and I hope we continue to, but ever since you were promoted to moderator status you've been a bit authoritarian
We might have seen the post coming but that doesn't mean it isn't true. Ricker has championship level expectations for the program and 2023 had the potential to be a monster class given the local talent yet castle is the only championship caliber player he thinks we've landed. It's an objective take even if you might not appreciate his negativity. Idk if he's even being negative he's just really disappointed.
Not if his take is based on an objective analysis of the players, which I believe it is. Ricker might have had his heart set on some guys but I don't think that means he's been unfairly critical of Ball and Ross.Isn't it pretty much the definition of a subjective take?
Not if his take is based on an objective analysis of the players, which I believe it is. Ricker might have had his heart set on some guys but I don't think that means he's been unfairly critical of Ball and Ross.
Are you saying Unless one is evaluating a player based solely on verifiable statistics then it cannot be objective? If that's the case then there is no such thing as an objective player analysis because it will always be based in part on one's own observations.It’s based on his subjective analysis.
Are you saying Unless one is evaluating a player based solely on verifiable statistics then it cannot be objective? If that's the case then there is no such thing as an objective player analysis because it will always be based in part on one's own observations.
Im done putting words in Rickers mouth But People are surely capable of objectivity without having to rely on statistics. We all make objective decisions every day without consulting spreadsheets first.I think that's exactly what he's saying. Seems pretty reasonable tbh